Thanks for your report. But one question : if you had been to japan with your D700 instead of the fuji. Pictures would have been better or not ?
I mean every body says it's crazy sharp and colors are amazing. But is it better than D700/5D2 ? If I take 10 portraits with the 5D2, and 10 with the fuji, then a landscape with both, which pics will be better ? Same situation, same photographer, no focus difficulty. Those from 5D2 or those from x-pro1 ? That's the only thing I need to know for switching.
Thanks

.
Hi wolf33d,
When you ask 'which pics will better?', this is a very subjective question because no two camera systems will deliver identical results even when all shooting conditions are identical.
When it comes to noise control under high ISO, skin tone, tonal gradation, resolution (these few parameters), I can offer my personal opinions as follows:
1) The image quality between the D700/D3 and the XPro1 is really very close. However, the XPro1 has done it with a APS-C sensor, i.e. more compact body, lenses that are alot lighter in weight. So for travel trip, I'd rather carry the XPro1 with the 3 lenses and a X100 as backup, instead of the D3s and a bunch of FX lenses plus the D700 for backup.
2) However, if I were to be on assignment to cover an event, shooting sports and action, where I need instant response and dead-on AF, I'd still be using my DSLRs and the FX lenses.
Things like colour, white balance, contrast, dynamic range, film simulation, etc., etc. can also be tweaked depending on which camera system you use. Most digital cameras nowadays offer in their menus customiseable settings that can be set and stored for easy recall.
So, all things said, FOR TRAVEL SHOOTING, I'd rather not be lugging around over 8 kg of DSLR gear when I can get just about similar image quality with equipment that weigh in at less than half. So, it'll be the XPro1 for my travel shooting in future too.
Cheers