Originally posted by shawntim
now now... did Clubsnap ever had more than 50 ppl who gathered at one place before?
Yes, if you're setting up something like a 'roadshow', well.. okay and fine.
Frankly, i just think that Clubsnap is NOT that big to generate that kind of response that would make this otherwise successful.
I can well afford the cash. But is it even justified? Remember, Amt Money Spent is never proportional to quality of time spent.
Now now, if you wanted to "challenged" the cost, why do so in such a mocking manner? No one ever said you weren't allowed to ask why there would be cost involved. But why ask in such an aggresive manner? Another member has actually asked what he was paying for. If you did not see it, allow me to point it out to you. 3rd post on the first page of this thread. But looked at how he came across. Says something, doesn't it?
And since when was consideration not given to members who weren't able to afford it or in your own words,
"I noticed the poll actually assumed that everyone can afford it. Does it ostracize the poorer ones?"
I believe there is a category that allows people to vote for the even to be FOC. Where did you come to the assumption that the poll assumes everyone can afford it?
I don't believe it's stated anywhere within the options, explicitly or implicitly. Don't be so anxious to point fingers or make such undue claims/accusation. It only reflects upon you and what kind of a person you are.
Even if someone isn't able to pay (if payment is required), i am quite sure we will not have the heart to turn the person away if he approached the organisers regarding the fact that the cost is beyond him/her.
Like Darren has mentioned, this post/poll is to gauge the response as well as see if it would be worth the time for the organisers to hold it.
If you deem the cost issue to be a factor, then state so. If you are speaking up for the poor, undertrodden, unappreciated or whomever you are champioining for, then so much the better for you but once more, a more conciliary tone would have help and definately gone a longer way.
And to answer your question of if "more than 50 members have ever gathered at one place before". I can tell you during SEEDs, the amount of people that turn up can get quite close and some don't stay due to the space constrain.
Anyway, your point that Clubsnap isn't "big" enough to generate any kind of response for such an event, then fair enough. But the organisers can hold a poll to ask if there would be interest, isn't it?
And to address your claims that people don't mix well during SEED, let me just simply put this across to you. On who, does the onus lie on, in regards to mixing around and establishing new friendships? What are your grounds of saying so? And i'm curious to find out if you been to a SEED as yet? Was it that unpleasant an experience for you? Did someone ostracize you? Who are these people who don't mix well? Or did no one talk to you?
Don't get yourself worked up Shawntim. It's not like the outing has been set in stone. It's just the first step, checking the level of interest. If you deem you have a right to question or ask, then i believe it's only fair that everyone else, including the organisers have the right to ask/test the water, to gauge the level of interest and response.
Good day.