PhilipKr35
Senior Member
Looking beyond the already nice DxOMark measurement of Q and Q10, 
Look at what some people did to Q, Q + Sigma 500mm , Wow, a Whopping 2790mm !
_IGP9515 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Squirrel
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pearsaab/8465827971/
Q Extreme Tele !
				
			Look at what some people did to Q, Q + Sigma 500mm , Wow, a Whopping 2790mm !
_IGP9515 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Squirrel
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pearsaab/8465827971/
Q Extreme Tele !
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
	 
 
		 
 
		 But I don't think the Q is the problem. Yes, downsampled to 1k it should be much sharper even coming from a 1/2.3" sensor. You don't need a K5 for that, it might be even worse because at the same distance to the subject you would need to crop massively (sure you could compensate with a longer lens).
 But I don't think the Q is the problem. Yes, downsampled to 1k it should be much sharper even coming from a 1/2.3" sensor. You don't need a K5 for that, it might be even worse because at the same distance to the subject you would need to crop massively (sure you could compensate with a longer lens).
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
