symmetrix
New Member
I'm beginning to suspect you're the only /b/rother here.![]()
INTERNET BROFIST!

Last edited:
I'm beginning to suspect you're the only /b/rother here.![]()
Why not 17-50??
I think because the 17-70 is a lot cheaper, almost half the price
brapodam said:Yup. I don't mind the 17-50 if the price is good though. After all I look at value too. Not just price
brapodam said:Yup. I don't mind the 17-50 if the price is good though. After all I look at value too. Not just price
bonrya said:Btw.. Just curious- Why did you sell away all your lenses? Lol
SamTac said:Busybody
bonrya said::sticktong fine! I'm off to bed then. LOL.
goodnight babes! :bsmilie:
F2.8 is useful
allenleonhart said:hmm if u got a sharp copy i guess its useful.
bonrya said:Morning everyone!![]()
bonrya said:Morning everyone!![]()
SamTac said:Pls take care of my "son".
Btw.. Just curious- Why did you sell away all your lenses? Lol
brapodam said:I wanted to only sell away my D5000 + 55-200, but the buyer only wanted to buy if I included the 18-55. I didn't want to delay longer because while I am not really in a hurry to sell my stuff, the value of the D5000 will drop significantly very soon because of the release of the D5100.