Hi,
I'm using a Lee Big Stopper, it's a 10 stop filter.I also own a Hoya NDX 400, is a 9 stop one.
![]()
I supposed u should be using lee filter system??currently looking at filter system no money to buy lee
Looking at hitech hopefully it's not expensive like lee haha
Which ND filter would you recommend as the first ND filter? I notice you are using Tiffen's ND1.2 filter for most of your shots... would you recommend it getting it over the NDX 400 as the first filter? Cos 9 stops seem quite alot... haha =D
Trying to decide which to get for my first ND...
Amazing pics btw, truly inspiring for new photographers like me =D
Amazing photos! Thoroughly enjoyed browsing through the 14 pages.
Hi Stefan, is it possible for you to PM me the location of Sembawang state land?
It has been a thorough pleasure browsing through your photos.![]()
Yeah I'm using Lee. Do consider the Lee and settle the best. For instance there's nothing wrong buying a Cokin for a start, but if you plan to upgrade to a HiTech, then later to a Lee, it's costly because of what you already have. You can sell your previous upgrades but you won't get the exact amount you bought for.
Hitech is good. It's gives a good bang per buck - way better than Cokin. But if you're serious about colour casting issues and don't want to see any of those magenta casts, go with the Lee.
Tiffen's ND 1.2 is good enough for most day to day, twilight morning and evening shoots for simple blurring out effects like waves on the beach ie. Punggol Beach without having to increase the f stops. NDX 400 and Lee Big Stopper is best used for mid day/afternoon with good sunlight and nice moving, fluffy clouds. The effects will be good. It's your choice, really.
But there's a word of caution though; if you use the 9 stop filter at low light/dusk hours, it'll take you minutes to get the shot to the correct exposure. Add on to the camera's noise reduction processing and that'll take you even 20 or even 45 minutes for just one shot. :bigeyes: By the time when the shot is processed the sun is down.I experienced that, lesson learnt. Come early.
Thank you!! There'll be more incoming! Stay tuned!
PM Sent.
after looking ard, i finally settled with lee filter holder, but pro stopper n big lee is out of stock...gotta wait...
I love your pic! Hope I also can this type of pic!!!
Lovely catches! Some of them look totally un-Singapore to me, which is GREAT!![]()
Tiffen's ND 1.2 is good enough for most day to day, twilight morning and evening shoots for simple blurring out effects like waves on the beach ie. Punggol Beach without having to increase the f stops. NDX 400 and Lee Big Stopper is best used for mid day/afternoon with good sunlight and nice moving, fluffy clouds. The effects will be good. It's your choice, really.
But there's a word of caution though; if you use the 9 stop filter at low light/dusk hours, it'll take you minutes to get the shot to the correct exposure. Add on to the camera's noise reduction processing and that'll take you even 20 or even 45 minutes for just one shot. :bigeyes: By the time when the shot is processed the sun is down.I experienced that, lesson learnt. Come early.
![]()
Thank you for your advice! I'm also wondering about your GND filter, from your post you only mentioned it's 3 stops... what GND filter are you using exactly? =P
2 more pieces of crap.
...
The kind of snapshot-like crap that everyone has. This.
edutilos said:Hi Stefan,
I do like a lot of your perspectives of Singapore, as I've said earlier before. You have a lot of good works. I just thought I'd share my thoughts upon seeing the statements I have quoted above (similar words have been posted previously as well). I wish to stress that this is just one perspective, and it is in no way meant to be judgemental (though inadvertedly, we as thinking human beings, do judge even when trying to avoid this, please disregard it if it does materialise).
The first point is that these are not snapshots or crap. They may not be all awe-inspiring, but they are not thought out haphazardly, and the arrangement of elements is pleasant. I'm not sure if you really think if they are "crap", but my own interpretation of such things is that if you post something online, usually you won't think too lowly of it - at least it will be ok for public scrutiny. This is the main reason why many people on CS get upset when negative comments are posted on their work. If you *do* think that they're crap, then I am puzzled as to why they are posted. If you don't, then there is no such need for pretense of self-derogation, the works stand as they are.
The second point is that just because a lot of people have the same perspective of a subject (or subjects) does not subtract from the value of one's work. To give an example, a lot of British photographers have captured Durdle Door in Dorset (I would like to think that you have seen photos of the location before); but it never seems to get tired as long as the subject is captured well, and the light is great. Similarly, the Merlion in Singapore, MBS, Shenton Way, etc... All these are landmarks which many have ventured to photograph. It still remains that what one tries to convey through his/her photographs is unique.
Anyways, just sharing some thoughts aloud, hope you are not offended, as I meant no offense.
edutilos said:Line of Fire - nitpicking here, the actual sky is brighter than the reflection of it, my suggestion is to tone the brightness of the reflection down to avoid this.