should be less then 2k but higher then the A550 bah guess around 1.6-1.8k
I would think so too bro. I believe it should be below $2k.
well that would really mean sony is going full force in undercutting the prices of the semi-pro market, assuming of course the a7xx specs would be equal to the d300s/50D.
well that would really mean sony is going full force in undercutting the prices of the semi-pro market, assuming of course the a7xx specs would be equal to the d300s/50D.
Not surprising. This year alone Sony release a total 6 new camera bodies. Everyone of them is price in a lower or very reasonable range. I would expect the same trend for A7xx replacement.
ya agree so next time ppl will not say "why sony" and will change their mind set .... ;P
huge improvement. I oso have a350 but disappointed in high iso noise, but I dun think its worth to upgrade just for faster fps and better noise control. I will save for FF camanyone tried out the A550 and able to comment on the noise management for this new body as compared with A350?
anyone tried out the A550 and able to comment on the noise management for this new body as compared with A350?
Canonikon fanboys will find the slightest thing to complain about the power of sony alpha.. Like body not "chio" enough etc..
Canonikon fanboys will find the slightest thing to complain about the power of sony alpha.. Like body not "chio" enough etc..
Canonikon fanboys will find the slightest thing to complain about the power of sony alpha.. Like body not "chio" enough etc..
Is it just me, or are the feel for canon cameras cheaper than sony's?
Canikon fanboys complain about everything...
I even heard one from another thread telling me GF1+lens+accessories cost more than a D700 body...I almost dropped off my chair when seeing that comment...
Some people just argue for sake of arguing without doing actual homework and making themselves appear like fools...
:bsmilie:
I also has 1 funny experience.
Go outing with my friend, and he bring another guy with him. This guy is very young, a JC boy I think. Before my friend introduce us each other, When he saw my camera, the 1st words he say is "Ah, Nikon is crap!" I just smile and say, "yes Nikon is crap!" He is very happy heard what I say, and ask me to move to his brand. I answer him, never, I'm using Sony. And his words is "Sony too a crap!"
So, we go for photoshots, and I found lot of his works is underexposed or overexposed. So I ask him, why like that, can you read the meter? And guess what his answer![]()
anyone tried out the A550 and able to comment on the noise management for this new body as compared with A350?
actually i just tried my friend's Nikon D90, the high ISO performance is amazing, win my A330 hands down! now i am wondering why din i settle for a higher end camera, not sure if the 500D and D5000 has the same performance, any comments?