that's quite a hot price!HydroPoP said:Body only = S$1499
Body + kit lens = S$1799
Body + kit lens + 75-300mm lens = S$2099
http://www.sonystyle.com.sg/sonysty...ay.jsp?Level1=26947&Level2=2063&page=sonyhome
wow........... bro, tats fast.pai said:hehehe, yesterday went to funan to meet someone... wander into the sony gallery... hmmm big boxes being opened...
i am now the proud owner of my second minolta-mount camera! film dynax 5 hehehehe
Bro Pai is lichFZ5owner said:wow........... bro, tats fast.
can try out some shot to show.
thanks
pai said:hehehe, yesterday went to funan to meet someone... wander into the sony gallery... hmmm big boxes being opened...
i am now the proud owner of my second minolta-mount camera! film dynax 5 hehehehe
from what i had read the D50 also win the d70s and D200 handdown(noise)Andy Ang said:Here is a live review on the stomach of the models using the Sony's Alpha at the Roadshow today.
![]()
I am quite a particular person, noise starts to get noticable from iso 200, and really gets bad from iso 400.
For Sony, perhaps that has improved quite a lot.
Of course the function is a lot easier... However, on the noise level, D50 still wins.
eow said:from what i had read the D50 also win the d70s and D200 handdown(noise)
hat off to the D50 i really like it
oth this alpha-100 is sony first release...hopefull by next release the noise problem will be better
wong_se said:I am newbie..So shall I say that how good a cam is , depending how good it can control the noise level ?
If Yes, then based on reading this thread, shall I conclude that D50 is better than D200 ?
If No, why spend all the entire effort just to look at nosie level..?
zcf said:If really talking about ISO noise alone here, Canon's CMOS still win hands down :sweat:
see Canon 1DMK2N (1.3X crop though) ISO1600 in action
J O L I N @ Marina Sq
I think it's depend on individual personal preferences, some prefer low ISO noise, colour, more lens support, built in Anti-shake, high quality lens (olympus's zuiko), build/ergonomics, price, friends etc.wong_se said:I am newbie..So shall I say that how good a cam is , depending how good it can control the noise level ?
If Yes, then based on reading this thread, shall I conclude that D50 is better than D200 ?
If No, why spend all the entire effort just to look at nosie level..?
I am not that old yet :sweat:Andy Ang said:Uncle, CMOS cameras out of the league. Dun compare like that leh. Want to compare a prototype sensor in research with CMOS sensor or not...
not really..if that the the case d200 would have to be thrown overboard....liaowong_se said:I am newbie..So shall I say that how good a cam is , depending how good it can control the noise level ?
If Yes, then based on reading this thread, shall I conclude that D50 is better than D200 ?
If No, why spend all the entire effort just to look at nosie level..?
new sensor as having improved low-light capabilities, and improved dynamic range. While a little confusing, what the company is suggesting is that by rotating the grid, they are able to match the image resolution of a camera that uses a higher resolution sensor. Hence, the company is comparing the light gathering capabilities of (as an example) a four megapixel sensor with the capabilities of the two megapixel sensor they believe will match it for real-world resolution. Obviously the light gathering area for each pixel can be greater on the two megapixel sensor, and hence there is likely to be an improvement in both low-light capabilities / noise and dynamic range.
Andy Ang said:I am quite a particular person, noise starts to get noticable from iso 200, and really gets bad from iso 400.
... However, on the noise level, D50 still wins.