This will really get photographers into deep trouble, i supposed..
I am organising TFP/CD for friend who is under 21 but above 18 ..
will I be jailed? :bsmilie:
okie .. i mean get myself into trouble ..
This will really get photographers into deep trouble, i supposed..
simon80 said:I am organising TFP/CD for friend who is under 21 but above 18 ..
will I be jailed? :bsmilie:
okie .. i mean get myself into trouble ..
simon80 said:I am organising TFP/CD for friend who is under 21 but above 18 ..
will I be jailed? :bsmilie:
okie .. i mean get myself into trouble ..
kennyleong said:I think from wad i noe.. must have the model relese..
*correct me if i'm wrong..
That's quite a one sided thing on MR if paid. A MR can mean a lot of things. In this case of the underaged gals, unless with the parent's signature, it's of course worthless piece of paper.simon80 said:MainPoint..
A ModelR is required only if the model is paid. Thus we own the copyright to the pictures. OTher than using for commercial purpose.
simon80 said:I did start a thread on TFP/CD issue before ... regarding getting a so called 'mento' in organising TFP thingy
I did hv lots of respone and I also ask quite a number of things on model release.
As I remembered ..
MainPoint..
A ModelR is required only if the model is paid. Thus we own the copyright to the pictures. OTher than using for commercial purpose.
OF course .. If I gonna organise. IS a TFP not a paid model shoot.
But then I wised or wanted to protect my friend .. Am afraid the pictures will end up at some indecent place.
Was suppose to do a shoot few weeks back .. but then It rained.
End up shooting the models myself :heart: :bsmilie:
In this case of the underaged gals, unless with the parent's signature, it's of course worthless piece of paper.
simon80 said:so is basically a kind of mutal agreement between the
model - organiser - photograhpers
I search for some online MR it states underage = <16
so in this case my friend is not underage ..
is the 2 ladies underaged?
simon80 said:so is basically a kind of mutal agreement between the
model - organiser - photograhpers
I search for some online MR it states underage = <16
so in this case my friend is not underage ..
is the 2 ladies underaged?
confirm + chop.simon80 said:so is basically a kind of mutal agreement between the
model - organiser - photograhpers
I search for some online MR it states underage = <16
so in this case my friend is not underage ..
is the 2 ladies underaged?
Hello... you're forgetting the contract is valid only if the law of that country states that too. Else even if your contract states it's ok for <16 to model, the law of the country says no without parental consent. Your nice butt will still get deflowered.simon80 said:so is basically a kind of mutal agreement between the
model - organiser - photograhpers
I search for some online MR it states underage = <16
so in this case my friend is not underage ..
is the 2 ladies underaged?
that makes me recall those photos available in sggirls.comespn said:Hello... you're forgetting the contract is valid only if the law of that country states that too. Else even if your contract states it's ok for <16 to model, the law of the country says no without parental consent. Your nice butt will still get deflowered.
Ma na wu pian.. that one not hosted in SG :bsmilie:Drudkh said:that makes me recall those photos available in sggirls.com
:bsmilie: sad.
kenny, i''m faster than you. :blah:espn said:Ma na wu pian.. that one not hosted in SG :bsmilie:
Drudkh said:kenny, i''m faster than you. :blah:
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=133511
espn said:Actually I could have been faster than all of you, I just didn't reply.Don't forget, my finger is always on the F5 key
![]()
espn said:Excuse? Hardly... did want to reply.. but thought, forget it.. then I turn my head only you two replied, so I joined in the fun.