Headshotzx
Senior Member
Nightwolf75 warned you, thinkvision: unless you can substantiated your rumours, i suggest you carry on your hit-and-run elsewhere.
Stop your rumors please. You don't seem to have any credibility at all.
Why would there be a need for a 135mm f/2L? It's already FF, it already has a wide aperture, and it's the sharpest (or 2nd sharpest) lens in the Canon lineup, equal to 300mm 2.8L / 200mm 2IS. Come on..
Last edited: