glad u like it. em... aren't u going to post some. would really want to see it
it's been 6 months n i'm not yet PP a single one..
abit lazy n busy.see how bah.
glad u like it. em... aren't u going to post some. would really want to see it
zoossh,
i haven't been active in 2009 and now i am going through all the travel threads of 2009...
i dunno why you feel that this was not a productive trip. each location is different, so your output is also going to be different.
let me boost your ego a bit. you are a master of composition and post processing. you bring ordinary subjects of daily life and put them on a throne. you have a hawk's eye and you see what most people don't. the colors in your photos are so vibrant, the post processing is so subtle, that i know the photos have been PP'd thoroughly (they are definitely not straight out of the camera in most cases), yet makes me fall in love with it. it feels so natural, that i could almost reach out and touch the subject.
when i was going through the photos, i was making mental notes of the photo #s that were my favourites. finally, i gave up. there were too many of them.
sadly, i only got a single trip in 2009.
think i have set the standard of my first trip in india as the mid-high output, and as such, that is so far my best in terms of consistency of fresh and good takes, and of cos plenty of happy portraits. my subsequent trips start to form fixed patterns which i can't help. and the weather in north india in jan is probably so good that is why i kept shooting. whereas for my other trips, i wasted a lot of time not shooting either due to mountain sickness or hot weather. i have confidence in the places i picked, just that the weather is too hot (u dun explore, u dun get refreshing shots)..... and of cos, portraits in the west is not as easy as it is in the east.
they can be reached out becos they are often shot at very close distances, whether wide angle or not. the colors takes on a different look not just becos of pp, but becos i used GND so frequently, that i managed to preserve the hue for some pictures (tonal and color latitude). of cos, if i can, i would want both colors and details, something that bryan definitely does it far better and i wish i can shoot like him (far more natural).
and thanks for your compliments, but dun worry, i'm neither humble or lack of confidence, but i set a higher (achievable) target for myself. well, i do like ppl to tell me what they like or what they do not like about each of the pictures (i dun have to agree but would like to know), which is why i prefer a forum thread, not a gallery, and not a flickr (dunno why every one in flickr only praises and seldom criticise.
i saved images i like. and would like to introduce this guy (sounds russian) http://www.flickr.com/photos/nygus/. i find a lot of similarities the way we frame, shoot, and process. we probably did most of the things the same way, only that he shoots better and the places he goes, wow, so many...
I wouldn't see the same thing and would never be able to compose the way you do.
I don't even fix a slight tilt in the horizon, because its too much work.
likewise, i will never shoot the passage of ecllipse like what you described last time and achieved on combined efforts in the other thread. but it sounds like a big ambition to do a series of that over famous landmarks all over the world... it probably will take a whole lifetime, but who knows, if u do that, u may become world famous photographer...
That reminds me. I still have photos from my Aug '08 eclipse trip which I haven't processed because I don't know how toit's ok. but just rem to do that for your eclipse shot. they are precious.
That reminds me. I still have photos from my Aug '08 eclipse trip which I haven't processed because I don't know how to
Night !