In a nutshell, we have to appreciate that the term photography is a generic term and covers many specialisations in photography. We have nature, architecture, portraiture, nude, salon, landscape, commercial, fashion, journalism etc.
The bottomline is no any specialisation is more equal or more superior than the other. Each has its own characteristic, its reason for existence, its own style and the need for different equipment. It is good to try every branch before I decide which branch to specialise in.
For an amateur photographer, it is natural that those who join clubs which are Salon oriented will like to have a go for Salon photography, as it is a good way to pit one's skill against the rest of the world. For those who flamed Salons, have you tried entering for one? Do not be misled by those posed pictures you see at some of the clubs' noticeboard and blindly stick the Salon label on them.
Salon is a French word meaning an exhibition or gathering of photographers to share their works. It is a good way to interact and see one another's standard. Some says the Salon works are cliched or old fashioned. Have they really seen more of Salon works before making this blind statement?
Salon circuit have expanded and now include many categories like Journalism, Nature, Digital imaging etc alongside the usual Pictorial Color print, B/W and slides. Gotta be updated, man. Not to offend, don't be a frog in the well.
The only reason which I can think of, why people criticise Salons is because they have no guts to pit their works, or they are afraid of failures. Usually those who criticise Salons are those who failed badly in Salons, the usual case of "sour grapes". Let us not get affected by them.
Though it is mentioned that the club outings usually have blackground, or models with smoke, does anyone understand the real rationale? I can only say this is a good practice for one to fine tune one's exposure and composition skill. Try taking it and get a perfect shot, if you can. No point saying it is not creative and bla bla bla. One can say that only if one can get the exposure and composition right and can do it better. Or else it will be like saying Ferrari is a lousy car just because one does not know how to drive it. Ridiculous right, since we know the magnificent prowess of a Ferrari.
Before we learn to fly, we ought to learn how to walk.
i am also disgusted by those who blatantly show disrespect for the titles that the photographers have. The photographers worked hard for their achievements, with sheer determination and passion. These titles are not easy to achieve. Try it first before you say anything disrespectful. These titles though may not show that the photographers are the best, but they show at least that they have reached a certain standards. Whether they are good will be based on their track records, usually based on their exhibitions, medals and trophies, recognition etc. One thing for sure is , these photographers have reached that standard.
In the meantime, enjoy photography and stop flaming the Salons and clubs.
The biggest tragedy a photographer can face is not to have enough works that people will respect you for.
Steven PC Yee