S5Pro unedited, un-enhanced, un-PP photos for technical discussion.


Status
Not open for further replies.
Standard Mode AFS 17-35, F8, ISO 200 at 400% DR

886183329_3356b784b3.jpg


Standard Mode, AFS 17-35, F8, ISO 200 at 100% DR

886183345_cdfd33c796.jpg

400% is really nice.
 

On the contrary, I feel that the 100%DR shot by Triodeman actually shows what can go wrong. It gives the impression that because the extended DR capability of the camera isn't used, you get blown-out clouds? Please, I've seen folks with D70 can do better.

My point is - get your basics right. It isn't just the camera. No doubt the S5 Pro makes it a lot easier to get great pics. But metering, exposure, blah blah blah, they are still necessary. In this case it is a PLBV. Sorry, Triodeman, but that's what it is.
 

Actually i shot this RAW with 400% DR using matirx metering system without any compensation as this lens tends to give a little -2/3 stop under-exposed.

Of-course you can still play around with the exposure to get what you want (cloud details or tables and chairs under shade), or you can even balance that a bit to try to get both details in. Surely, the exposure/contrast etc. on the camera can be adjusted to show good cloud details at 100% DR (I have tried that before on other shots), but the table and chairs under shade will probably not as clear. :)

The point I was making here is just to show the DR capability of S5Pro and not so much into showing the optimum exposure for the shot. ;) Perhaps the S5Pro in this regard is little more forgiving.

But of course you are a more experience S5Pro user than me ...

On the contrary, I feel that the 100%DR shot by Triodeman actually shows what can go wrong. It gives the impression that because the extended DR capability of the camera isn't used, you get blown-out clouds? Please, I've seen folks with D70 can do better.

My point is - get your basics right. It isn't just the camera. No doubt the S5 Pro makes it a lot easier to get great pics. But metering, exposure, blah blah blah, they are still necessary. In this case it is a PLBV. Sorry, Triodeman, but that's what it is.
 

Hi,
Took this from yangshuo, china last week. converted from ACR 4.1. unedited

_DSF0588.jpg


The S5 pro, like the D70, tends to underexpose, sometimes by 1 stop. Though not as bad as the D70.
Another thing i noticed, the histogram feedback shape from the S5pro is quite different from the histogram in adobe CS3. Many photos looks ok based on the histogram on the camera but is slightly underexposed when viewed in my laptop. Anyone experienced this?
 

After viewing through all the luvly pics here... yes, I agree it's PLBV... but man...

I must save up $$$ for the S5Pro :)
 

After viewing through all the luvly pics here... yes, I agree it's PLBV... but man...

I must save up $$$ for the S5Pro :)

tempt u a bit more then.. so far, all the pics from s5 are outdoors. this is my most recent studio shoot. shot with a 35-70/2.8 in F1 mode, CCD-RAW converted to JPG in LR. added a border in CS3. dats abt it. almost as straight from the camera as u can get.... now, if only adobe can create an in-cam software to do this... :devil:

0914.jpg


yy - once in a while, u might get lucky and see a s5pro on sale in buy/sell. tho, i would suggest u still keep ur current nikon, for some situations where a little more speed is required.
 

some indoor shots ;p

both shot using RAW, 1/60s f/5.6 ISO 1600 EV +1/3. white balance using grey card (the 2nd shot at least... ;p)

DSCF2816.jpg


DSCF2807.jpg


yeah yeah...made a boo boo. din realize i was on iso 1600...din check :embrass:
 

Great shot you got there, sir!

Thanks for the attachment and advice. Appreciate.

Yes, even when I'm ready for the s5, I'll still keep the D70S; been serving me well.



tempt u a bit more then.. so far, all the pics from s5 are outdoors. this is my most recent studio shoot. shot with a 35-70/2.8 in F1 mode, CCD-RAW converted to JPG in LR. added a border in CS3. dats abt it. almost as straight from the camera as u can get.... now, if only adobe can create an in-cam software to do this... :devil:

0914.jpg


yy - once in a while, u might get lucky and see a s5pro on sale in buy/sell. tho, i would suggest u still keep ur current nikon, for some situations where a little more speed is required.
 

For the building photos, did you use one of the film simulation mode? Like F1b or F2?? I never see such a blue sky in S'pore so far.
 

The S5 pro, like the D70, tends to underexpose, sometimes by 1 stop. Though not as bad as the D70.
Another thing i noticed, the histogram feedback shape from the S5pro is quite different from the histogram in adobe CS3. Many photos looks ok based on the histogram on the camera but is slightly underexposed when viewed in my laptop. Anyone experienced this?

I've noticed that it tends to underexpose when using bounce on SB800. Thus I key in +1
on SB800. But then when I use a diffuser with the +1, it overexposes...

Without using flash, I think the exposue is spot on. I usually use spot or centre weighted.
 

F2 mode, ISO100, 1/125, f16.0
5468.jpg


F1c mode, ISO160, 1/30, f8.0, flash fired
6080.jpg
 

F1c mode, ISO200, 1/60s, f11.0, flash fired
And yes, this is out-of-camera. No photoshopping whatsoever.
8154.jpg
 

F2 mode, ISO100, 1/15s, f16.0
5436.jpg


F2 mode, ISO100, 8s, f11.0
5421.jpg
 

F2 mode, ISO100, 1/30s, f2.8, flash fired
3619.jpg
 

just testing my new lens.:)

F1b mode, ISO1000, 1/160s, F1.4, flash fired. WB auto.

DSCF8141.jpg
 

Haha... S5 Pro cats?

F2 mode, ISO100, 1/30, f5.6
1586.jpg


100%DR Std/Std/Std, ISO100, 1/20, f5.6
1576.jpg


400%DR High/Std/Std, ISO200, 1/20, f5.6
1621.jpg
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top