Photos taken by Pentax cameras for tech. discussion - Season VI


I will go test test with the FA43/77. I adjusted until +6. Is that too much?

How much did you adjust to?

Hmm. It depends on your lenses and your body. My one so much different.

Think I need to - 10 or 20 for my fa24.
The rest varies between - 2 to - 10...
A few lenses no need adjustment.
 

Pentax Q7 again in Bali.
I basically use it as the long reach camera/lens.
Very handy as I did not need to spend time changing lenses, without the weight of a conventional 200mm lens.


IMGP2415 by jenkwang, on Flickr


IMGP2416 by jenkwang, on Flickr
 

I just realised that I never did AF adjustment for the Sigma. I did a +6 for the DA*16-50 and just did a +6 for the Sigma. Not good . . . My K7, K5, K30 did not even need AF adjustments . . .

Is this an inherent problem of the K3?

Poseur customer service is open for business. I heard one unhappy customer lol.
 

Tamron 10-24

10397829_899581176735554_9128252054993794806_n.jpg



Sigma 150-500

@150mm
10338242_898800786813593_7683178016442519362_n.jpg


@500
10402744_898800773480261_338030862419721653_n.jpg



Pentax Da15 ltd
10464202_898800816813590_3244302014534357002_n.jpg
 

Some of the shots from my trip in may to thailand

Little Green Bee-Eater ( Juvi )
14093236260_6f9ea9eae5_c.jpg


Oriental Scops Owl (White Morph) Side Profile
14195856427_19939c957b_c.jpg


Red-wattled Lapwing
14150965220_40f116d322_c.jpg


Streaked Weaver Couple
14116231127_dcd8d99015_c.jpg


Oriental white-eye
14102799289_da776239c0_c.jpg
 

Tamron 10-24

10397829_899581176735554_9128252054993794806_n.jpg


Pentax Da15 ltd
10464202_898800816813590_3244302014534357002_n.jpg


Nice.
Did you use a GND or blend in the sky?

The shot with the DA15ltd is something we take for granted.
That flare resistance shooting right at the Sun, is not what every USA lens can do w/o issues.
 

Some of the shots from my trip in may to thailand


Beautiful birds.
I see some noise in the bkgnd.
What ISO was it and I assume shots like these need quite a bit of cropping?
 

Some of the shots from my trip in may to thailand

Little Green Bee-Eater ( Juvi )

Oriental Scops Owl (White Morph) Side Profile

Red-wattled Lapwing

Streaked Weaver Couple

Oriental white-eye

Swee.....really hv to learn from you. So far my sig150-500 still hvnt put into good use....shots some animals from zoo recently and will post soon.
 

Nice.
Did you use a GND or blend in the sky?

The shot with the DA15ltd is something we take for granted.
That flare resistance shooting right at the Sun, is not what every USA lens can do w/o issues.

Hi jk thx for your compliments. The 1st pics i only used a cpl as that day the sky quite blue. After went home i used standard adjustment to fine tune and thats all.

As for the pics for da15, yes its true that this lens we always take it for granted as alot people find it not wide enough. I myself also a victim of super wide angle lens. But one thing that others wide angle lens cant really replace is the flare resistance and its starburst....swee swee not many horses can run....lolxx....thx jk again and glad the pics work for you. Cheers
 

Beautiful birds.
I see some noise in the bkgnd.
What ISO was it and I assume shots like these need quite a bit of cropping?

Hi,

The iso of these shots, the highest was on iso1600,which is the white eye. the shot was not denoise and also can say need abit of cropping for the shots as well.. personally find that the noise was not so noticeable so did not do any denoise as i do not know how to denoise properly without the details of the bird being not affected.
 

Swee.....really hv to learn from you. So far my sig150-500 still hvnt put into good use....shots some animals from zoo recently and will post soon.

No la,

Still very far from good,as jk pointed out,some noise in my shots,not good enough. Now you have the lens already,do find time to shoot more when you can,we can go out shoot tgt of course when there is chance,more than glad to share what i know but do not be disappointed.:confused:
 

Hi,

The iso of these shots, the highest was on iso1600,which is the white eye. the shot was not denoise and also can say need abit of cropping for the shots as well.. personally find that the noise was not so noticeable so did not do any denoise as i do not know how to denoise properly without the details of the bird being not affected.

Thanks for sharing those insights.
I only know that most likely high ISO is needed but never knew how high.
Many ppl underestimate how hard it is on the settings.
Bird in shade, need to have good shutter speed to prevent shake and bird movement blur, long focal length, shooting at f4 or higher)
All adds to the ISO very fast.

I use nik define.
That will be in a separate layer.
Then mask out.
Not for birds of course.

Often I'd not bother with NR too if the photos are downsized and the noise is not glaringly obvious.
 

No la,

Still very far from good,as jk pointed out,some noise in my shots,not good enough. Now you have the lens already,do find time to shoot more when you can,we can go out shoot tgt of course when there is chance,more than glad to share what i know but do not be disappointed.:confused:

You are too humble. Sure sure for the birding outing...will let u know once i can mastered my lens lolxx. Thanks in advance
 

Thanks for sharing those insights.
I only know that most likely high ISO is needed but never knew how high.
Many ppl underestimate how hard it is on the settings.
Bird in shade, need to have good shutter speed to prevent shake and bird movement blur, long focal length, shooting at f4 or higher)
All adds to the ISO very fast.

I use nik define.
That will be in a separate layer.
Then mask out.
Not for birds of course.

Often I'd not bother with NR too if the photos are downsized and the noise is not glaringly obvious.


To add, if were to shoot birds in action under non-ideal lighting, we can go as high as iso 6400 :cry:
 

Back
Top