Photos taken by Pentax cameras for tech. discussion - Season III


Status
Not open for further replies.
agreed..FA 43 starburst

6620373919_52a8ebf0e2_z.jpg


but of coz..in my mind..nothing beats the starburst of DA 15, the main reason i bought the lens for

6875065472_b60765c2df_z.jpg

does the "form/shape" of the starburst change with the aperture used or simply a function of the number of aperture blades the lens has? I'm asking because I almost always use f11 on my sigma 10-20 but the starburst effect is not so clean/swee like the da15 or even the fa43 above.
 

does the "form/shape" of the starburst change with the aperture used or simply a function of the number of aperture blades the lens has? I'm asking because I almost always use f11 on my sigma 10-20 but the starburst effect is not so clean/swee like the da15 or even the fa43 above.

Both. Less emphasis on the star points if a larger aperture is used, and of course, the number of aperture blades affects the number of points the star has.
 

Both. Less emphasis on the star points if a larger aperture is used, and of course, the number of aperture blades affects the number of points the star has.

I realise that smaller apertures will result in more apparent "star burst" effect, but i was wondering how come the "star" from my sigma always seems abit "fuzzy" for want of a better word... its like the "spokes" of the stars are not sharp unlike the samples form the fa43 & da15 above. For example, see below:

6860646969_59cd4f8332_b.jpg
 

Both. Less emphasis on the star points if a larger aperture is used, and of course, the number of aperture blades affects the number of points the star has.


it's weird, I thought that the number of points the star has = number of aperture blades

my vivitar 13mm has 6 blades, and the star also has 6 points
IMGP6669hdri.jpg


my K 24mm f2.8 has 5 blades only, but the star has 10 points
IMGN0018.jpg
 

For even number , number of blade = number or pointed star
For odd number , number of blade = x 2 for number of pointed star

I think I read from somewhere before
 

I realise that smaller apertures will result in more apparent "star burst" effect, but i was wondering how come the "star" from my sigma always seems abit "fuzzy" for want of a better word... its like the "spokes" of the stars are not sharp unlike the samples form the fa43 & da15 above. For example, see below:

That looks like flare...
 

For even number , number of blade = number or pointed star
For odd number , number of blade = x 2 for number of pointed star

I think I read from somewhere before

That is correct:

vantagepointimages.com: Sunstars: Adding Sparkle to Your Compositions

The explanation for this is given here in Pentaxforums in greater detail by aerodave: Sun star effect - PentaxForums.com

Actually, all lenses when stopped down will produce twice as many diffraction spikes as there are blades. Unless they have very rounded aperture blades, that is...but that's a different discussion.

Each straight edge in the iris is responsible for creating a pair of spikes. But in the case of an even number of blades, the spikes from opposite sides line up. Think of a hexagon, and how each face has a parallel opposite face, whereas a pentagon does not have that property.

So a 6-bladed aperture does, indeed, create 12 diffraction spikes, just as a 7-bladed aperture creates 14. But half of the 12 spikes caused by the hexagon lie on top of a twin, and therefore there appear to be only six. The can be evident if the two opposing blades aren't perfectly parallel. Look at the first picture in this thread. The spikes at 1 o'clock and 7 o'clock are noticeably doubled. That's because the edges forming those spikes aren't exactly parallel, and the resultant spikes are just a tiny bit misaligned. All six spikes in that image are actually made up of two...it's just that one pair that reveals the secret doubling.

I myself prefer what the Tamron 10-24mm gives with 7 blades , as mentioned in the review of that lens: http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/revi...0-24mm-f-3-5-4-5-di-ii-ld-pentax-cameras.html

7versus6.jpg


14 pointed star versus the Sigma 10-20mm's 6 (7 blades versus 6).
 

Last edited:
For even number , number of blade = number or pointed star
For odd number , number of blade = x 2 for number of pointed star

I think I read from somewhere before

i think its right..tats why DA 15 with 7 blades gives a 14 pointed star and FA 43 with its 8 blades give a 8 pointed star
 

I realise that smaller apertures will result in more apparent "star burst" effect, but i was wondering how come the "star" from my sigma always seems abit "fuzzy" for want of a better word... its like the "spokes" of the stars are not sharp unlike the samples form the fa43 & da15 above. For example, see below:

6860646969_59cd4f8332_b.jpg

the starburst in front of fullerton is more defined..so it cld be flare as pointed out by edutilos..maybe shutter speed could make a difference as well (my guess)
 

Hee hee ... That's one of the reason I love my 8-16mm too. 7 blades :) 14 pointed star . Ha
 

Just back from Hala Bala today. Not much captures there but got a few nesting shots.
This is one of them:-

Quite low lighting, shot at iso 2000
Asian Paradise Flycatcher - one of the most beautiful flycatchers, too bad it's a female, male will be 10x prettier.

Asian Paradise Flycatcher #5 by kengoh8888, on Flickr

Taking advantage of the bird hatching the eggs and almost no movement, shot at a longer exposure time for lower iso.

1/6s, iso 200

Asian Paradise Flycatcher #3 by kengoh8888, on Flickr
 

Last edited:
Odd numbered aperture blades = 2x the starburst points (7 blades give 14)
Even number blade = same number of starburst points (6 blades give 6)

The more the aperture blade is closed, aka stopped down, the longer the trail...

To make it more obvious and define, use longer exposure..
Longer exposure allows more of the image to be "burned" into the sensor, in this case, starburst points..
:D Try compare between 2 shutter speeds, 1 more slower than the other and see the starburst effect..
 

Night shot with Sigma 18-50 F2.8
6959050271_75bfcca4d8_b.jpg
 

I usually avoid shooting with high ISO, but the K-5 is changing my mind.
ISO 3200 with DA21 wide open
7024940911_e71877e06b_z.jpg
 

thanks to everybody who posted above abt the star burst effect. Interesting insight. :thumbsup:

Shall play ard with the exposure settings more next time I get to go out & shoot to see if it changes things. Cheers!
 

Singapore Botanic Garden

6877834342_d028891855_c.jpg
 

Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top