Photos taken by a Pentax camera for tech. discussion - Season 0


Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi, I took some photo of this Long-tailed Shrike today.
For those that are against the sun, i noticed very serious purple color at the edges of the branch, beak etc.
Quite sad when i see those photos.

Here is one that is not that serious, but still noticeable at the branches. I have some pics where the whole branch (the thinner one) is purple in color :sweat: Can anyone tell me how i can prevent from getting such purple color again? Thanks

Pick a different background rather than against the sky?
 

Last edited:
Pick a different background rather than against the sky?

Think toshio217 is more concern of his birding shots (not other photography) with strong backlight, so choosing a different background is not applicable. :sweatsm:
 

Last edited:
Think toshio217 is more concern of his birding shots (not other photography) with strong backlight, so choosing a different background is not applicable. :sweatsm:

Oh icic! Isn't shooting against strong backlight causing those purple fringe that he is concern? Oops, not an expert in birding, will let others do the talking, hehe
 

Oh icic! Isn't shooting against strong backlight causing those purple fringe that he is concern? Oops, not an expert in birding, will let others do the talking, hehe

No prob bro. I also interested to know if there's any solution. ;p
 

setup: vivitar 105, kenko 1.5x TC, metz 48 + DIY bounce card, diffuser.

found this katydid near singapore quarry (near dairy farm) today :)

very cute fella. this pic was my favourite cos it highlights the long, slender legs.

cropped:
IMGP6064%20copy%20crop.jpg


take away the kenko 1.5 and move closer, likely you have better IQ. The cropped picture would have been sharper as you will need a lesser light power without the kenko 1.5 teleconverter. My imho;)

marcus
 

Thanks bro for the link, I've been using PS to correct PF using similar method. ;p
But just wondreing if there's any way to prevent or minimise it? :think:

Using CPL? might or might not work.
 

take away the kenko 1.5 and move closer, likely you have better IQ. The cropped picture would have been sharper as you will need a lesser light power without the kenko 1.5 teleconverter. My imho;)

marcus

agree with your assessment... i'm mainly using the TC to get 1:1 with less effort :sweat:

with the TC, i still have the last 1/2 to 1/4 round of the focusing ring to play with and more working distance.

without the TC, have to focus out all the way and shift back and forth till i find the min-focusing distance. by the time i shift the tripod and get the right distance, insect may fly away already :( end up missing shots rather than getting sharper pix.

skills not there yet... will practice more. :embrass:
 

New-Out99999_99998-1.jpg



taken in my kitchen, no idea wats the name..
but it's those super tiny insects that crowd around food that's slightly spoilt..

good effort. the stacking is much better. except some shadow at the hind legs, cant really tell. try to shoot outdoor more often. the air is fresher. :)
 

My first try shots of this insect,non intentional marco shooting but happen
to bump in to this lovely pair at SBG.

Taken with K10D / A 50mm marco lens / pop up flash.

Shutter:180- Aperture F16-22- ISO 400

1st couple
IMGP9218-Copy.jpg


photography sometimes is an expression or visualisation of our mind. seeing your LLF series, i can say 60% of your mind is filled with copulation images! :sticktong

nice effort. if you lower the contrast & increase the fill light, you can lift up more details at the dark shadow on the lovers' body. :think:
 

IMGP6064%20copy.jpg

ISO: 200, Exposure: 1/90 sec, Aperture: 11.0
setup: vivitar 105, kenko 1.5x TC, metz 48 + DIY bounce card, diffuser.

found this katydid near singapore quarry (near dairy farm) today :)

very cute fella. this pic was my favourite cos it highlights the long, slender legs.

cropped:
IMGP6064%20copy%20crop.jpg


more pix from this set can be found here:
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6512814#post6512814

nice find. can see you like creatures with long legs. :bsmilie:

long hair too? :sweatsm:
 

nice find. can see you like creatures with long legs. :bsmilie:

long hair too? :sweatsm:

Interesting question. ;p you got see me post in portraits forum before?

Let's just say that subject's gotta have 4 legs and above to interest me :bsmilie:
 

good effort. the stacking is much better. except some shadow at the hind legs, cant really tell. try to shoot outdoor more often. the air is fresher. :)
thanks for the encouragement~
i'm having class from mon-sat...
 

these are taken with a lens I helped someone to acquire... just testing the lens to make sure that its a sharp copy before i pass to him ;)

to cut the long story short, i was pleasantly surprised by this lens... images are sharp (as macro lenses tend to be), colours are vibrant, OOF areas is smooth and handling is pretty excellent. it has a long focus throw so MF is great :lovegrin:

its a PK lens, so obviously, no A contact, can't set aperture with body and p-ttl won't work properly... naturally, with a lens like that, it takes more effort to use, but once u get the hang of it, its pretty sweet.

my main issue with this lens is that like all short macro lenses, min focusing distance is pretty short and the lens gotta be practically right on top of the subject in order to focus at 1:1. this is challenging when dealing with shy insects.

anyone used this lens before? any views to share?

Panagor 55mm F2.8 macro
all shots taken at between F8 - F11. Exposure: 1/125, ISO: 200. Flash on M mode.

#1
IMGP6175%20copy.jpg


#2
IMGP6179%20copy.jpg
 

Last edited:
more samples from the Panagor 55:

#3
IMGP6182%20copy.jpg


#4
IMGP6191%20copy.jpg


#5
IMGP6200%20copy.jpg
 

5004502466_05c5a1da0b_z.jpg


Donald, got this cricket shot to share. dual flash w raynox shot at bukit batok last month.

post note: i dont know what happen. here is the link.
 

Last edited:
ah... ha... thats a cute one... i like the way u've captured the detail of its mouth... nice :)

but never show its long legs... if got show the long legs even better :bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
had put up the link. guess flickr is playing up again.

yah lah.... it happens. how do u like the ones taken with the panagor 55mm that i posted?

i like the first one... the shiny fly. :) i've been struggling to catch the details on that one but always end up with blurred pix cos its so small and the reflective body always messes it up.

finally got a decent one.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top