Yes Bamboo, I think the macro lens are too expensive. I have check the website and the 45mm f2.8 macro lens cost much more than the 25mm f1.4. And yes, Panasonic only have 1 macro lens.Macro lens are expensive. I think there is only one in the lumix line up. You can refer to my earlier posts in this thread regarding cheap alternatives to macro lenses.
Personally, I like to use a lensbaby when I shoot close up of products because it gives better control of the exact spot I want to be in focus, regardless of distance.
For the time being, I think I have happy enuf to use the 12-35 to shoot food or maybe I get the 25mm f1.4 to get more bokeh at the background of the food. So, I won't go into the lensbaby or macro tube or macro filter as I am not familiar ... Hahaha
OIC, so for outdoor with my son and the buildling/shophouse as background is considered as Portrait ? So must change to a more tele lens ? I remember before I bought my 100-300, I also test at the shop with the Olympus 75mm f1.8 and the bokeh was superb. So this Olympus lens will also be good for this, right ?For portraiture, you will definitely get a very blurred background when you use the long end of your 35-100mm, especially at f2.8
Anyway, for info, I didn't buy the Olympus 75mm f1.8 because it cost around $1.2K.
Thanks
Last edited: