Thoth
Senior Member
Thoth, Oceanpriest, thanks for you replies.
Hmm... I guess there aren't too many who know of this thread or have much interest in old/non-mainstream lenses.
I got a pretty good number of insights over at another forum and I think I learned quite a bit.
Ok... now sample set No.2
#3
#4
For Set1
I'm undecided (a reason for this blind test as well).
There are some things going for #1 like smoother bokeh and sharper falloff from focus to OOF parts.
However #2 has a bit deeper color/contrast on the focus part and no CA (at least in the shot)
For Set2, I think its the bit longer FL of the lens for #4 that makes the lone leaf only partly in focus compared to the sample #3.
Interesting to me then that shallower DOF does not always mean better shot if the DOF is not enough to envelope the subject. (almost a religion in a FF argument)
I do like the shallower DOF and rendering of #4 though.
Too bad I did not step back when shooting #4 to get back the same DOF. (something to note)
For me, same as Set1, I like a bit of both, 50/50 in fact. (just can't make up my mind, which is a reason why I posted this blind test)
I prefer #4. The leaf seemed 3D-ier to me. N d Bokeh seemed not so harsh. Just my 2 cents worth. Cheers.