[ OFFICIAL RELEASE 2010.09.14 ] - Olympus E-5

[NazgulKing]

Yes, If you look at the diagram, it's as though the anti-aliasing filter has been removed to incorporate a completely computerized design, even though that is apparently not the case.

It seems to me that graphics hardware for computers and monitors has been removing the moiré and false color for quite a long time, so I'm not sure why they think it's impossible to do it. Finding room in a camera body may be more difficult but hardly impossible.

I don't think it's a question of room. Graphic card chips on computers are already pretty small. The real issue is the heat dissipation. That is the big limiting factor for the graphic processing.

 

[spidey89]

I don't think it's a question of room. Graphic card chips on computers are already pretty small. The real issue is the heat dissipation. That is the big limiting factor for the graphic processing.

But mine is huge! takes 2 slots :bsmilie: then again, one slot is for ventilation, but the whole thing is quite big on its own

 

[NazgulKing]

But mine is huge! takes 2 slots :bsmilie: then again, one slot is for ventilation, but the whole thing is quite big on its own

Of course. But you can't possibly put a big fan in a camera. Imagine the noise!

 

[NMSS_2]

All these tech talk about how good this and that is seriously marketing garbage! Need real production images please!!!!

So far from what i see of "olddo" 's pics..... very disappointing! :bsmilie:

More marketing trash here..... Oops not up yet.
http://olympus-imaging.jp/product/dslr/e5/special/impression/index.html

 

[bousozoku]

I don't think it's a question of room. Graphic card chips on computers are already pretty small. The real issue is the heat dissipation. That is the big limiting factor for the graphic processing.

The one necessary for 12 MP would be about 7 or 8 years old and only need a fraction of the processing ability, so it could run quite cool and with low power. In fact, those used in Apple's iPhone could probably be re-purposed for the work and have the added ability to work in 3D.

If Olympus contracted with the right group, they'd find their equipment value priced and competitive. However, I believe NIH (Not Invented Here) is an Olympus problem, as it was with Apple before they started to be incredibly successful again.

 

[fierywise]

That's where the money is because there aren't many competitors.

However, when the E-400 was introduced, it was the absolute smallest dSLR and we can see what happened with that.

Hopefully, they can do something about their niche status and put an exceptional camera body in each category.

Pardon me but what happened? Sorry, I am still pretty new here... heez...

 

[CTN]

I have decided, no more spending $$ on Oly gear until there is clear direction that 4/3 will continue to be supported with meaningful developments.
And yes, E-5 is not worth $2k++.:sticktong
I'd rather buy a Nikon D7000 which is cheaper and arguably better .

 

[Benares]

I have decided, no more spending $$ on Oly gear until there is clear direction that 4/3 will continue to be supported with meaningful developments.
And yes, E-5 is not worth $2k++.:sticktong
I'd rather buy a Nikon D7000 which is cheaper and arguably better .

Certainly true if you have not invested much on the 4/3 systems...

 

[Sispecho]

I have decided.

Im going for a shopping spree, Olympus or not.

 

[kuanwk]

I have decided.

Im going for a shopping spree, Olympus or not.

and wat r u gonna buy? 8)

 

[Sispecho]

and wat r u gonna buy? 8)

That one is still undecided.... lol

 

[bousozoku]

Pardon me but what happened? Sorry, I am still pretty new here... heez...

Nikon started selling the D40. Then, the D40x and replaced that with the D60. About that time, Olympus had been at the E-420, losing share in a niche it created. Olympus also introduced the E-450 with art filters and created some interest but Nikon was already entrenched.

Most people new to photography know two names, neither name is Olympus.

Thankfully for Olympus, Panasonic had a good idea with micro Four-Thirds and they're still selling quite well, but they really need to fix things. Once again, they need to hire new engineers who aren't looking at the same solutions over and over.

 

[Tenelia]

Nikon started selling the D40. Then, the D40x and replaced that with the D60. About that time, Olympus had been at the E-420, losing share in a niche it created. Olympus also introduced the E-450 with art filters and created some interest but Nikon was already entrenched.

Most people new to photography know two names, neither name is Olympus.

Thankfully for Olympus, Panasonic had a good idea with micro Four-Thirds and they're still selling quite well, but they really need to fix things. Once again, they need to hire new engineers who aren't looking at the same solutions over and over.

So well said. When will the day come when they return to E-1 ergonomics?:cry:

 

[albertri]

I have decided, no more spending $$ on Oly gear until there is clear direction that 4/3 will continue to be supported with meaningful developments.
And yes, E-5 is not worth $2k++.:sticktong
I'd rather buy a Nikon D7000 which is cheaper and arguably better .

same here bro same here....

 

[bousozoku]

So well said. When will the day come when they return to E-1 ergonomics?:cry:

Only when they've lost too much of the market, just as they had by the time they were developing the E-10.

They said they tested and tested and tested and decided that buttons in meaningful places worked better than menu items chosen from a display.

The E-10 was not particularly different than the IS-series but it was respected. It certainly beat the C-2500L before it.

They need to put at least two messages on the walls of the engineering area: the first would be image quality and the second would be ergonomics, so they'll never forget again.

 

[Evilmerlin]

Taiwanese comparison of the E-5, E-3, GH1, E-PL1. E-5 running on v0.9 firmware so pre-production set.

http://photofan.jp/camera/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7735&forum=2&start=20

Lens used was the 150mm f/2 for all cameras.

Looking good so far!

 

[bousozoku]

Taiwanese comparison of the E-5, E-3, GH1, E-PL1. E-5 running on v0.9 firmware so pre-production set.

http://photofan.jp/camera/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7735&forum=2&start=20

Lens used was the 150mm f/2 for all cameras.

Looking good so far!

That seems a good improvement for the E-5, especially since the GH1 has the improved sensor and the E-5 doesn't.

 

[napalmdog]

Taiwanese comparison of the E-5, E-3, GH1, E-PL1. E-5 running on v0.9 firmware so pre-production set.

http://photofan.jp/camera/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7735&forum=2&start=20

Lens used was the 150mm f/2 for all cameras.

Looking good so far!

nice... clearly outperformed the GH1 and EPL1. things are looking pretty good

 

[diCam]

That seems a good improvement for the E-5, especially since the GH1 has the improved sensor and the E-5 doesn't.

The next thing is to see the pictures with your own eyes.

 

[bousozoku]

The next thing is to see the pictures with your own eyes.

Yes, now, if someone could fly me to Taiwan... :bsmilie:

For the cost, I could almost buy an E-5.