lamester
Senior Member
guess I was just too angsty and growing increasingly impatient after seeing bro microcosm's rant. It has not helped after the announcement of the D7000 and K-5.
Last edited:
[ OFFICIAL RELEASE 2010.09.14 ] - Olympus E-5
- Thread starter headfonz
- Start date
guess I was just too angsty and growing increasingly impatient after seeing bro microcosm's rant. It has not helped after the announcement of the D7000 and K-5.
i'm pretty impressed with the high ISO, NR off shots. i like how it appears to be more grainy than having chroma noise or banding
guess I was just too angsty and growing increasingly impatient after seeing bro microcosm's rant. It has not helped after the announcement of the D7000 and K-5.
Its alright, initially after reading everyone's comments both good and bad,I was also affected, but after sitting down and think for awhile, just use what is available rather than thinking about why it is as so
I agree, I hardly see any colour noise though I do see nice, very nice indeed, I hate colour noise but noise is ok to me
more pertinently, there's no moire.
and it's only taken with the 12-60mm... only. :bsmilie:
guess I was just too angsty and growing increasingly impatient after seeing bro microcosm's rant. It has not helped after the announcement of the D7000 and K-5.
Add the K-r to that list and it would be a really good 4 way test.
It's become far too interesting without much real life information.
betta01
New Member
Not to forget the New Sigma flagship the SD1. It may well turn really well.:sweat:
Personally I am really looking forward for its reviews and to hands on when available.;p
Die.
The more samples I look at the more the poison sets in.
Must start pixel peeping to purge...
NazgulKing
Senior Member
Yeah... the minute you hit ISO3200 and pixel peep... the glorious noise is quite clear..
oh i'm not worried about that kind of noise.
what i'm looking out for is colour and texture consistency
if it's consistent it's easy to eliminate if needed; and won't show up in A4 prints.
it's the false colour and colour bleed that is worrying, because that WILL show up in print.
(un)fortunately the e-5 jpegs don't show false colour.
which is good; but (bad) for the bank balance.
some crops after 3rd party NR is applied
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=36395692
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=36395692
Evilmerlin
Senior Member
If you're serious. Sigma cameras, to me, are a lot like Samsung end user products. They have good hardware and really, really terrible software. Both companies are becoming better but they really need to hire some company with experience in ease of use to get some training.
Is that surprising? I wonder how many firmware updates the E-5 will take to be stable.
The Olympus E-5 Brochure in Japanese language 18.3MB is out.
skeletonman
New Member
The ISO performance is really good! 
albertri
Senior Member
If I only consider within Oly I would say yes the ISO is a welcome upgrade......... now if I add other brands.... its a different ball game.... There are some entry level cam that cost half of E5 that could perform similar or close to it.....
I dont think anyone from other brands will migrate to E5... still find E5 a bit 1 or 2 yrs behind its competitors...
Sorry guys this is just my observation...
I dont think anyone from other brands will migrate to E5... still find E5 a bit 1 or 2 yrs behind its competitors...
Sorry guys this is just my observation...
Similar threads
