Yes, this is why I say my cam battery is quite ok. I mean 843 shots is quite close to the description on the 5D3 manual, though they mentioned one fully charged battery can last for about 950 shots under normal temperature. Correct me if I am wrong.
I highly doubt that Canon will scr3w early adopters over and drop the RRP too drastically over the next 1-1.5 years.
fotoworx said:I wouldn't bet on that!
KangS said:The 3rd paty LP-E6 sold to me by TK has worked fine for about 2 years
ngwmk said:Guys, I just tried to fix my CZ 50mm f1.7 to the mkiii. Guess what. It does not work. The mkiii cannot recognize the lens thus doesn't allow me to release the shutter. Not sure if it's due to the cheap confirmation chip. Then I tried my Leica R 60mm lens. Damm, the adapter can't even fit onto my mkiii. Seems to be very tight. But it was able to fit on my 40D easily. This is really no good news as I have sold my 40D.
what is the street price now ar for 5d3
think have to rent the 17-40L before i purchase it for 5DMK3.
you all talk like the corner sharpness really sucks to the core.![]()
Guys, I just tried to fix my CZ 50mm f1.7 to the mkiii. Guess what. It does not work. The mkiii cannot recognize the lens thus doesn't allow me to release the shutter. Not sure if it's due to the cheap confirmation chip. Then I tried my Leica R 60mm lens. Damm, the adapter can't even fit onto my mkiii. Seems to be very tight. But it was able to fit on my 40D easily. This is really no good news as I have sold my 40D.
FM Reviews - Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM review
FM Reviews - Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM review
In any case, I highly doubt that Canon will scr3w early adopters over and drop the RRP too drastically over the next 1-1.5 years.
alamak.. hope my old c/y cz 85mm will work when i get my mkIII :SI tried all mode. When I hook up the CZ lens, it says something like cannot upgrade firmware on the LCD. Sigh... Sian man. Looks like can only use "Canon" lenses or my confirmation chip sucks...
i know the 16-35L II is great but i want to know how 'bad' the 17-40L is.
thanks for the links anyway!
Why does everyone say the 17-40 is bad?
Strangely, Ken Rockwell said otherwise…
Canon 17-40mm Performance
i've no complains with the 17-40 mainly because it's way cheaper than the 16-35 and it uses 77mm filters so all my existing filters wil work..dun need to find more expensive 82mm ones for the 16-35
i can't make an informed decision also, with so many varying reviews. filters are also a problem.
think really need to rent the lens and test it myself.
i tried looking up MTF charts, the 17-40L seemed as sharp as 10-22 at f8, both zoomed out to widest.