Kongfu
New Member
Sigma 17-50 can be compared to canon 17-55. You might be surprised to know that sigma is sharper than canon however sigma tends to be softer on the coners. The focusing of sigma is fast and quiet but not as good as canon. Some people prefers sigma because its lighter and cheaper. If you can get a sharp copy it is a good alternative to canon. Tamron also have a similar model but their model has noisy motor and it haunts in lowlight situation. Canon 17-55 is my walkabout lens And it has served me well. It is currently dubbed as the hidden "L" lens in IQ but not in build
yea review said so too....but it's kinda expensive

it's normal for someone who is just starting out to BBB. try curb the wants and focus on your needs instead.
in the long run, you will save more money without having to buy lenses which will be deemed useless to you.
my 17-55 is pretty sharp throughout the entire frame, one of the reason why i got it, cause' the 3rd party offerings are touted to be sharp in the centre and not as good as the canon in the corners.
USM is fast fast fast, no 2nd doubt about it. actually i feel that the sigma is pretty good, in fact better than the tamron, albeit at a higher price.
yea..trying very hard to curb the virus of spending......
If youre planning to go deeper into this hobby then go for 580 exii. This flash is more powerful and it is a good investment in the lomg run. Think how much dedicatiom you can put in photography, and determine which equipment suits your needs dont buy on impulse. Avoid the buybuybuy virus
will definitely consider....
Thx alot all bros...
