Odex Directors wanna sue anime downloaders in Singapore.


Status
Not open for further replies.
So... MoonHub had arguments... but never state what arguments they had....

so.... MoonHub users are also awaiting to be pwned. :dunno:

so now what ?

everyone join forces and pwned Xedo and taint both Sing's and the other man for life ?
Waiting to be pawned?

Now that questions had been raised, there has been a Subordinate Court ruiling that sets the precedence on privacy laws and in addition questions had been raised about the so-called 'settlement fee' is actually purely ADMIN FEE that covers their own investigative cost, I think people will start arranging appointments with Odex AND the Lawyer and walking into the office with a Lawyer.
 

Wah...abit hard to swallow the fact that singnet consented and its lawers didn't even turn up for the hearing...
 

yah.. both owned by Sing and Ho,

i know... saw that on hwz already...

btw, pacman's internet very louya ok.... accept for the privacy part.

andd..

well..... i think very soon, there will be a couple of law cases going straight into odex's office....

and i mean VERY SOON...

law cases?! louya louya lah if right now people care more about privacy.
 

But what about the 2 regarding ST and SH? :think:

what and see what happen with pacnet appeal. singnet cannot do anything already coz their appeal window closed. Starhub also i think. But now the fact that singnet never fight at all is not going to be viewed favorably at all.
 

law cases?! louya louya lah if right now people care more about privacy.

think about it... pacman can do it once. it cannot protect you twice... who knows in the future what will happen...

the thing is that the law infrastructure is there.... either way also cannot run away.

so if Pacman wins the case, and SH and ST decides to stand up and fight against xedo. i guess things will change if both SH and ST wants to protect their business and customers.
 

what and see what happen with pacnet appeal. singnet cannot do anything already coz their appeal window closed. Starhub also i think. But now the fact that singnet never fight at all is not going to be viewed favorably at all.

ST cannot already, because they CONSENTED it... whereraes SH acted out because theres court order...

so if they can reverse this, i guess SH subscribers can countersue Xedo for damages.
 

think about it... pacman can do it once. it cannot protect you twice... who knows in the future what will happen...

the thing is that the law infrastructure is there.... either way also cannot run away.

so if Pacman wins the case, and SH and ST decides to stand up and fight against xedo. i guess things will change if both SH and ST wants to protect their business and customers.

the important thing is the precedent is set and odex cannot show that its the exclusive licensee or producer. unless they pull something out. I think this case has gone beyond pirarcy already. ST guarantee cannot fight, they've lost in the court of public opinion and since they sign away their right to contest before they cannot do anything to reverse it.
 

ST cannot already, because they CONSENTED it... whereraes SH acted out because theres court order...

so if they can reverse this, i guess SH subscribers can countersue Xedo for damages.

i want to know if the fact they were shown as pirates before can be used against them in court by people who counter sue.
 

with these juicy new infotainment, do the 17 Songnet subscribers have a case against Songnet? ;p
 

ST cannot already, because they CONSENTED it... whereraes SH acted out because theres court order...

so if they can reverse this, i guess SH subscribers can countersue Xedo for damages.

Those SH whom signed that paper can countersue meh. :think:
 

with these juicy new infotainment, do the 17 Songnet subscribers have a case against Songnet? ;p

not against ST la i guess...

should be sueing them for damages directly to Xedo.
 

with these juicy new infotainment, do the 17 Songnet subscribers have a case against Songnet? ;p

eh eikin the judge's statement satisfy your q about whether odex can sue or not?
 

not against ST la i guess...

should be sueing them for damages directly to Xedo.

in terms of privacy leh? say if your mobile company sell/give away your telephone number, you song bo? :angel:
 

Those SH whom signed that paper can countersue meh. :think:

Cannot. because SH and ST users kenna because of the court orders. but IF SH and ST decides to do somthing to reverse the whole issue, den the ball game is different.

as for now. Pacman users can prepare their ammunitions and send xedo a lorry to load up to changi beach liao.
 

in terms of privacy leh? say if your mobile company sell/give away your telephone number, you song bo? :angel:

Its a court order leh... they also bo bian la actually.

and ST is owned by TH and LHY leh... lagi bo bian.
 

Its a court order leh... they also bo bian la actually.

and ST is owned by TH and LHY leh... lagi bo bian.

according to the article, Sing Song lawyer never appear for hearing woh ...
 

Just to clarify the blog post. The 2 directors of gamesmart who are charged cannot be shown to be SS and PG for sure right now. it cannot be verified whether 2 of those directors listed in the ACRA report were indeed charged to 15 mths of jail.
 

according to the article, Sing Song lawyer never appear for hearing woh ...

ST and SH lawyers didnt appear for hearing. and yes. its the fact. didnt appear at all..
 

Just to clarify the blog post. The 2 directors of gamesmart who are charged cannot be shown to be SS and PG for sure right now. it cannot be verified whether 2 of those directors listed in the ACRA report were indeed charged to 15 mths of jail.

hmmmm... true. but if ACRA has information that the business is runned or operated by these 2 man with matching identities, den it should be correct.

If identity cannot be matched.. no point pinning both of them for something they didnt do either.

but if Identities match.....

Xedo and these 2 man is doomed for sure.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top