newpaper's report on XMM shoots


Status
Not open for further replies.
folks, why don't we transfer some of these ideas to FAQ? if not, sooner or later, these suggestions will be drowned by TCSS.
 

just like simple comments posted by me in a PnP thread had helped up his thread 3-4 times viewership.
:bsmilie:

We never underestimate your crowd-pulling power.

Maybe you should be CS Ambassadoress?
 

why not charge models advertising fees if they wanna look for services here...since they wanna get paid shoot of course must pay a fee otherwise wat? free advertising?

like buy sell forum...they have ratings for the quality of the products at 10 being mint... so 10 is like highly experience level...so if those no experience ones cannot just come and $50/hr

For modelling service offered

They should have
- rate per hr
- experience 0-10
- portfolio url
- email
- limitations/restrictions/others

then charge them to the amount that the shoot organisers are paying for advertising. This way...those really cheapo models would steer clear and standards may increase too...I believe that problems will reduce significantly
Do take some note that some of those 'models' (I lolz~ This label shouldn't even be used on them) relate 'experience' as to how many photoshoots they attend.

It pays if the Sweet Young Thing got nothing but a pretty face or twin peaked assets enough to drive monks and nuns into sex maniacs and they can so-called lotsa 'experience' when any decent photographer can simply facepalm just by taking a peek at the photos.
 

folks, why don't we transfer some of these ideas to FAQ? if not, sooner or later, these suggestions will be drowned by TCSS.
Ok~ No prob~

P/S: Help me transfer leh~ ;p
 

if you have yet to notice... we constantly clean up that section...:devil:
Yup. I'm aware of housekeeping done. Jus thinking if it can be automated to reduce workload.
 

Do take some note that some of those 'models' (I lolz~ This label shouldn't even be used on them) relate 'experience' as to how many photoshoots they attend.

It pays if the Sweet Young Thing got nothing but a pretty face or twin peaked assets enough to drive monks and nuns into sex maniacs and they can so-called lotsa 'experience' when any decent photographer can simply facepalm just by taking a peek at the photos.

hahaha thats why make them pay...and experience must be clearly stated...not simpy i done a couple of shoots so i do not accept TFCD anymore...
 

hahaha thats why make them pay...and experience must be clearly stated...not simpy i done a couple of shoots so i do not accept TFCD anymore...

well the best or, most of those i've seen so far is not done a couple of shoot so dun do TFCD... its from TFCD become a paid shoot...

btw, for most of us, "visible targets", not much issue, its those hidden in the background ones, those who will make the models offering TFCD suddenly feel that they are supermodels... those are the scary CKPs that are making us look bad...
 

well the best or, most of those i've seen so far is not done a couple of shoot so dun do TFCD... its from TFCD become a paid shoot...

btw, for most of us, "visible targets", not much issue, its those hidden in the background ones, those who will make the models offering TFCD suddenly feel that they are supermodels... those are the scary CKPs that are making us look bad...

What is CKP? :what:
 

well the best or, most of those i've seen so far is not done a couple of shoot so dun do TFCD... its from TFCD become a paid shoot...

btw, for most of us, "visible targets", not much issue, its those hidden in the background ones, those who will make the models offering TFCD suddenly feel that they are supermodels... those are the scary CKPs that are making us look bad...
Think going to raise another TFCD war again, but I think some QC must be there.

Some of the TFCDs I see.... well, *facepalm* is probably the word. And some expect to be paid, thinking they are supermodels when they don't even know how to pose.
 

Think going to raise another TFCD war again, but I think some QC must be there.

Some of the TFCDs I see.... well, *facepalm* is probably the word. And some expect to be paid, thinking they are supermodels when they don't even know how to pose.

Hey Jeff ! But but... u say pretty.. other may say ugly leh :cool:

Like that how?
 

Think going to raise another TFCD war again, but I think some QC must be there.

Some of the TFCDs I see.... well, *facepalm* is probably the word. And some expect to be paid, thinking they are supermodels when they don't even know how to pose.

Posing is one thing... emotion, the "acting" is another.
 

you want acting go and hire actors.

Sometimes the model's facial emotion is much more important than the pose. Nothing brings out the emotion of the shot more than the face and eyes. Unless its just posing and smiling....

Modelling is not about all smiling and happiness.
 

Sometimes the model's facial emotion is much more important than the pose. Nothing brings out the emotion of the shot more than the face and eyes. Unless its just posing and smiling....

Modelling is not about all smiling and happiness.

smiling is a form of expressing emotion. lol. :sweat: ur statement seems rather contradictory. first u say facial expression is important, den next claim modelling is not about all about smiling... so is it, or not?...

if the face is that important, why do XMM need to wear so little? :bsmilie:
 

smiling is a form of expressing emotion. lol. :sweat: ur statement seems rather contradictory. first u say facial expression is important, den next claim modelling is not about all about smiling... so is it, or not?...

if the face is that important, why do XMM need to wear so little? :bsmilie:

exactly. u either want one or the other. u want someone who can channel expression and emotion go get an actor.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top