redstone
Senior Member
A desperate (in a good sense) measure would be, do it like the advertising section... but let it be free. Models/photogs would have to go thru a special registration process. Of cos this ain't feasible.
newpaper's report on XMM shoots
- Thread starter jeanie
- Start date
- Status
A desperate (in a good sense) measure would be, do it like the advertising section... but let it be free. Models/photogs would have to go thru a special registration process. Of cos this ain't feasible.
TheQuestion
New Member
go thru special registration process...wow where have i heard that b4? best solution? totally shut down any and all advertising and solicitations. like that the forum's name will not be besmirched by black sheep. o wait. that ain't feasible either
redstone
Senior Member
go thru special registration process...wow where have i heard that b4? best solution? totally shut down any and all advertising and solicitations. like that the forum's name will not be besmirched by black sheep. o wait. that ain't feasible either
We can advise... final decision up to admins.
go thru special registration process...wow where have i heard that b4? best solution? totally shut down any and all advertising and solicitations. like that the forum's name will not be besmirched by black sheep. o wait. that ain't feasible either
aiya, just let the black sheeps roam free lah, since nothing is feasible. when there are no wolves, sheeps roam free, logic mah. :bsmilie:
redstone
Senior Member
We need hunters to control the population.. Else they overun the land and visitors visiting would think that this is a land of animals.
no, oni there will not be any grass left. the world is round, things may not affect us now but when it does, there may be no turning things back to where it once was. then we're screwed.
Long Thai Bean
Senior Member
Look ... I think you mean well with your suggestion and also with your other thread to suggest an age restriction .... http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4567344#post4567344
But really, i think this is a very rash knee-jerk reaction ... What you have suggested may sound good in theory, but may be very difficult to implement in a cyber environment where everyone hides behind a "nick" and can lie about just anything ...
We even have photographers lying about their work and trying to pass off other people's work as they own ... Are we going to try to regulate that as well ???
Besides ... CS is not the only source of XMM models ... there are so many other avenues to find these models ... Just go to Friendster or My Space or some Blog sites ... there are just too many of them available out there.
Stopping CS as a source does not mean that CS will not be mentioned by TNP in their next "investigative reporting" when they discover it is still photographers from CS going to these other avenues to get young models to shoot ....
Education and Educating these models is the key to trying to stop this whole issue ... I think Averal and Ejunlow has done is very commendable ... I just wish some of these "model-wannabes" take time to read these articles.
TheQuestion
New Member
why u think i roll my eyes. its obvious redstone was flogging the same dead horse that not just him but a number of other people have been doing. what you said is the better long term solution. :thumbsup:
TheQuestion
New Member
still need a sheep dog la otherwise the mindless sheep go over cliff :bsmilie:
its their freedom to choose wadever they wish? :sweatsm: then got less to take care of liao... :bsmilie: more manageable!
g-khoo
Senior Member
i onced slammed her and her boyfriend for producing trashy images with equally trashy DI when they started blaming it on their equipment. in the end that thread became one of the hottest thread too.
hahah she branded herself as a former freelance model. I wonder what's the definition of model. The reporter must be laughing in his heart thinking...
"model? former freelance model? LOL, go back must tell the rest of the people what models have become in singapore. But sigh die die must haf something to write, so forget it la"
TheQuestion
New Member
well i will say thing: looking at the tnp shot no wonder i haven't seen any full front shots of her. bo chap la modeling is not her day job so she's got nothing to worry about.
night86mare
Deregistered
let's not mudsling individuals here
newspaper report has nothing to do with the individual incidents here; if we daisychain them together, then we are also sinking to that certain level.
cheers
newspaper report has nothing to do with the individual incidents here; if we daisychain them together, then we are also sinking to that certain level.
cheers
TheQuestion
New Member
can't be helped since the paper named kirk and averal so they've become the faces that people want to take their frustrations out on.
night86mare
Deregistered
no need to play the blame game here
if there was no kirk
if there was no averal, there would be other people to take their place.
only a matter of time, anyways, if i be blunt
Hi guys
I actually don't think the article is so bad.
Of course they're trying to find an angle on it.
But I think our conscience are clear. There are some of us who are shooting girls in lingerie.
TNP wants to make it seem like shooting girls in lingerie is disgusting and wrong.
This is not true.
There is also nothing wrong with photographs focusing on one's sexuality. There's a whole genre of it.
To those photographers who do shoots which focus on sexuality and sexiness (however you define it), you have a responsibility to ensure that your pictures are of a quality where even if people disagree with your direction, they can respect your skill.
Let's not be too affected by TNP. Those people logging into CS because of this article may be disappointed to find out that there most of the pictures here aren't like what they read in TNP.
BTW agentmonkey it was Razor who posted that image of the woman in mitre hotel, not me.
I actually don't think the article is so bad.
Of course they're trying to find an angle on it.
But I think our conscience are clear. There are some of us who are shooting girls in lingerie.
TNP wants to make it seem like shooting girls in lingerie is disgusting and wrong.
This is not true.
There is also nothing wrong with photographs focusing on one's sexuality. There's a whole genre of it.
To those photographers who do shoots which focus on sexuality and sexiness (however you define it), you have a responsibility to ensure that your pictures are of a quality where even if people disagree with your direction, they can respect your skill.
Let's not be too affected by TNP. Those people logging into CS because of this article may be disappointed to find out that there most of the pictures here aren't like what they read in TNP.
BTW agentmonkey it was Razor who posted that image of the woman in mitre hotel, not me.
- Status
Similar threads
