denniskee
Senior Member
Oeii Basket...You guys are suppose to help me & give me advise on what to do & what not to do leh...How come the topic is still on my Nick har?
;p
what to do, we never have a movie star in cs mah.:bsmilie::bsmilie:
Oeii Basket...You guys are suppose to help me & give me advise on what to do & what not to do leh...How come the topic is still on my Nick har?
;p
Wow!70-200mm f1.2! I can't even imagine how big that would be! You'll definitely get a workout from that ;p
what to do, we never have a movie star in cs mah.:bsmilie::bsmilie:
Don't disturb me lar...I'm no movie star...just a part time Porn Star nia...;p
Thank you for the advise, but I'm currently using only the Pop-Up Diffuser on my Flash.
Does the External flash play a lot of difference?
Sorry Lar, Newbie question is like that one...;p
Yes, you will have more control on how the lights to be on your pics
And also it help to stop motion as you can use higher shutter speed
Chow Yun Fatt said:Yes, I agree with you. They'll eventually get tired.
I use a 70-200mm f1.2 to capture them from a distance because if I'm too close, they will touch my Lens, ask me to play with them and get easily distracted, so I use this as my primary lens. Because I cannot work with a Tri-Pod, my arms are getting a good work out also...:bsmilie:
I really love taking portrait shots of them, all kids are so natural, not plastic at all.
jopwork said:Wow!70-200mm f1.2! I can't even imagine how big that would be! You'll definitely get a workout from that ;p
Chow Yun Fatt said:Actually its not that heavy & you get to shoot the kids at a very comfortable distance...especially swimming pool when you don't want to get wet.
i am also shoot a lot of my kids photos by using my 18-200mm f3.5-5.6, shooting outdoor usually is not a problem for me, the pics turn out nice. but when come to indoor, like indoor playgroup, science center...etc.. most of pics blur. i am wondering if 50mm F1.4 will be the solution? (i dun feel comfortable using flash on kids).
Feed them Sugar?....Are you insane?...Already now I'm like a GPMG Gunner &
You still want them on a Sugar High?
I don't have a 50 f1.4 but I have a 35 f1.8 that I currently use for shooting kids indoors (and high ISO too). I don't like using flash on kids because it makes them aware that I'm shooting them. They always start trying to avoid camera after the first shot. I'm finding that 35mm is also too short as they also notice me when I'm trying to shoot them. I'm planning on getting a longer lens like 50mm or possibly 85mm.
just to check is 35 f1.8 "fast" enough to shoot kids indoors without flash?
70-200 f/1.2???????
Since when did Canon make such a lens? Please take a photo of this lens and show us, Fatt-kor...! How much did it cost? US$80,000 ???
70-200 f/2.8L already rather heavy, and yet you say that the 70-200 f/1.2 is not that heavy? You must look like this
![]()
http://visualrian.com/storage/PreviewWM/3321/61/332161.jpg
Good place to learn is our portrait and poses section. Take a few portrait shots and post it there. You'll get lots of useful comments.
Another way is to join photoshoos. There are always a few every weekend. During photoshoots observe what others are doing and ask to look at their shots. Chat with them, you can learn lots.
i am also shoot a lot of my kids photos by using my 18-200mm f3.5-5.6, shooting outdoor usually is not a problem for me, the pics turn out nice. but when come to indoor, like indoor playgroup, science center...etc.. most of pics blur. i am wondering if 50mm F1.4 will be the solution? (i dun feel comfortable using flash on kids).
there's a lot of debate about usage of flash on kids.
Personally I feel that bounced flash is very safe, especially if no irritation is felt.
One usually experiences irritation first, and only with more intense light would damage likely occur.
If one does not even feel irritation, then it's likely (in my opinion, I stress again) that no damage is done.
Use a big powerful flash like EX430 or EX580 and tie a small card in front to block any possible direct light.