It's not a complete overhaul, they just added 1 extra (aspherical) element. The size increase is probably due to the added focusing motor.? why you think no difference?
Actually from the information I have now, it seems to be a big difference as the optical formula is TOTALLY different. The lens changed from 52mm filter thread to 58mm. They added aspherical element. Looks like a complete overhaul. I will be VERY dissappointed with nikon if they cannot make a better lens after overhauling the optical formula and increasing the size significantly.
Also, if you compare the AF 50/1.4D to the AF-S 50/1.4G, the difference in sharpness is not much. The big difference in sharpness and colour reproduction (between the D and G versions) is with the other primes like the 24, 35 etc. Not the 50mm.
Yes, but something is wrong if you spend the whole time looking at MTF charts. Images from the lens matters more than numbers. Is the marginal increase in sharpness (at least, from the MTF charts, the difference looks minimal) worth the (almost) double price?AFS 50/1.8G
![]()
AF 50/1.8D
![]()
linked from nikon website. it's going to be sharper.
Last edited: