New!!! 50mm f1.8 G lens


Nice pics baggiolee.. By the way what nikon model are you using.. Anyone here that uses d90+50mm1.8g can post pics please. How is it with d90? Thanks
 

Nice pics baggiolee.. By the way what nikon model are you using.. Anyone here that uses d90+50mm1.8g can post pics please. How is it with d90? Thanks

baggiolee's signature shows D7000, which like D90 is also a DX-body. Should not be any significant difference to D90 in terms of image quality, bokeh, etc.
 

sorru newie here, what is the different between 35 f1.8G and 50mm f1.8g? thanks

like ZCA said, 1 is 35mm n the other's 50mm :rolleyes: both give a different FOV. to see which focal length suits u more, set ur kit lens to 35mm or 50mm n shoot at these focal lengths all the way
 

sorru newie here, what is the different between 35 f1.8G and 50mm f1.8g? thanks

If you are shooting a DX body, then 35mm is (normal), and 50 is slightly (tele)...For instances, in studio, one might shoot full body with a 35, and do a head and shoulder shot with the 50....and a crowd with a 14 or 20m...(DX of course)...
Now in the case of full frame, the 50 becomes "normal" (full body shot), and a 75 or 85 becomes "head and shoulders"...The 35 becomes slightly wide and the 20 and 14 become very wide....;) Of course if you only have one lense then you just let your feet do the zooming, forward for the head shot and back up for the full body or crowd>>>:bsmilie:

Cheers
 

Last edited:
If you are shooting a DX body, then 35mm is (normal), and 50 is slightly (tele)...For instances, in studio, one might shoot full body with a 35, and do a head and shoulder shot with the 50....and a crowd with a 14 or 20m...(DX of course)...
Now in the case of full frame, the 50 becomes "normal" (full body shot), and a 75 or 85 becomes "head and shoulders"...The 35 becomes slightly wide and the 20 and 14 become very wide....;) Of course if you only have one lense then you just let your feet do the zooming, forward for the head shot and back up for the full body or crowd>>>:bsmilie:

Cheers

you make it more confusing la!! ;)
hehehehe....
 

Some sample shots of my new 50mm 1.8G for reference for those who are planning to try this lens. I like it so much .... All are shoot wide open

5890026148_799b7f2ffa.jpg



5950730520_4522326f40.jpg



5889824256_c175e2fc29.jpg



5915517201_50265e6e5a.jpg



5950122281_e7b805bfac.jpg
 

Last edited:
thanks for the pics baggiolee... :)
Bokeh looks quite decent, especially considering the price.

thx!


Nice pics baggiolee.. By the way what nikon model are you using.. Anyone here that uses d90+50mm1.8g can post pics please. How is it with d90? Thanks

yap..it's a D7000. shouldn't be any significant diff. unless maybe you pixel peep.
 

Last edited:
more pics.

since it's national day..
DSC_9066.jpg


DSC_9085.jpg


DSC_9078.jpg


DSC_9183.jpg
 

im another satisfied user of this lens also. great for taking streets too :bsmilie: allow me to contribute also :P

6021438949_c0cff739a8_b.jpg


6021997728_c4f1241a17_b.jpg


6021445693_724642bfb6_b.jpg


all were taken wide open at f/1.8
 

Last edited:
any idea which shop sells this cheapesT?
 

more pics.

since it's national day..
DSC_9066.jpg

im another satisfied user of this lens also. great for taking streets too :bsmilie: allow me to contribute also :P
6021997728_c4f1241a17_b.jpg

all were taken wide open at f/1.8

From these 2 pics, to me it feels like the lens doesn't handle contrasty backgrounds too well. The individual spots of light do seem rather distracting even though they're out of focus. When the background is evenly-lit, the bokeh is much more pleasant. Overall still looks better than the 50/1.8D :)
 

If you are shooting a DX body, then 35mm is (normal), and 50 is slightly (tele)...For instances, in studio, one might shoot full body with a 35, and do a head and shoulder shot with the 50....and a crowd with a 14 or 20m...(DX of course)...
Now in the case of full frame, the 50 becomes "normal" (full body shot), and a 75 or 85 becomes "head and shoulders"...The 35 becomes slightly wide and the 20 and 14 become very wide....;) Of course if you only have one lense then you just let your feet do the zooming, forward for the head shot and back up for the full body or crowd>>>:bsmilie:

Cheers

Also really depends on the size of your studio. 85 works well also as half body for FF, and 135 works great as head and shoulders for FX.
 

From these 2 pics, to me it feels like the lens doesn't handle contrasty backgrounds too well. The individual spots of light do seem rather distracting even though they're out of focus. When the background is evenly-lit, the bokeh is much more pleasant. Overall still looks better than the 50/1.8D :)

Very nice already bro, compared to the D. ;P

See the donuts here?
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2471/3821815354_97d3fa8f73.jpg
 

Also really depends on the size of your studio. 85 works well also as half body for FF, and 135 works great as head and shoulders for FX.
Buzzmario was just asking for some input on the 35m vs the 50m so I was giving him some examples...I did not want to confuse him with FOV, but in retrospect that approach may have been better... :cool: Yeah, I have even stood outside the door and shot into one of my former studio's with my 300 f2.8 for a certain effect....and lately I've been experimenting with a 50m 1.8 on one of my M4/3 Oly's..(its like shooting with a 100mm on my FF cam)...My Guam studio space is 20' x 40' (Its an old Bar)...My shooting space in Bangkok is considerable smaller so I have to use normal to wide FOV, unless I step out into the hallway...Ha Ha...:bsmilie:

Cheers
 

I want to get this lens for my D7000. Was not sure whether to get the 35mm or 50mm, but now I think I'll go for the 50mm 1.8G. Checked price and was quoted 279$ at SLRR.
 

Back
Top