luckyorange
Senior Member
Ya.. but.. 80% of my money goes to my wife for household expenses so ... haiz... wahahaha so have to save a longer time...![]()
haha no choice =x...
Ya.. but.. 80% of my money goes to my wife for household expenses so ... haiz... wahahaha so have to save a longer time...![]()
haha no choice =x...
Ya what to do... family come first... wahaha![]()
This site has a good comparison of many 50mm lenses -- check it out -- there are lots of bokeh tests at various apertures. Think people have posted this link before:
http://mansurovs.com/nikon-50mm-f1-8g-review#more-15792
This guy really likes the new 50/1.8G lens a lot!
ZerocoolAstra said:Not too much of an issue in good lighting conditions, but indoors is another matter altogether.
Thanks for the tips.
Normally I shoot at 1/40 or sometimes at 1/50 uf light permit. I realise at f/16 the contrast drop. Do you have this problem or its my shaky hand again?
Thanks for the tips.
Normally I shoot at 1/40 or sometimes at 1/50 uf light permit. I realise at f/16 the contrast drop. Do you have this problem or its my shaky hand again?
baggiolee said:usually ppl don't go beyond f8. r u shooting 1/40 handheld? this lens has no vr, for me i kiasu abit, so i shoot at min 1/80 handheld.
Thanks for the tips.
Normally I shoot at 1/40 or sometimes at 1/50 uf light permit. I realise at f/16 the contrast drop. Do you have this problem or its my shaky hand again?
bigpond said:One factor that can cause a decline in contrast at f/16 is diffraction. For most lenses with apertures ranging from say f1.4 to f16, you'll get max performance in the mid range around f4 to f8. Big apertures suffer from optical aberrations; whereas at very small apertures like f16 or f22 in some lenses, you'll get reduced sharpness and contrast due to diffraction.
Thanks for helpful sharing.
What normally is the best f number for scenery?
bigpond said:For max depth of field, yet avoiding diffraction issues, I try not to go beyond f11. If your objects are all far away, depth of field is not such a big concern, you'll get incredibly crisp and sharp images at f5.6 to f8 with the 50mm.
Has anyone tried buying this lens from Malaysia? Is the price worth buying?
For low lights, I would suggest to use auto ISO and maintain 1/100 shutter speed at any aperture you will use and surely it's a sharp output. A little cleaning for the noise and you're done. Much better compared to a blurry photos. Give it a try and you will be happy ... heheNot too much of an issue in good lighting conditions, but indoors is another matter altogether.
For low lights, I would suggest to use auto ISO and maintain 1/100 shutter speed at any aperture you will use and surely it's a sharp output. A little cleaning for the noise and you're done. Much better compared to a blurry photos. Give it a try and you will be happy ... hehe
Without a doubt, the Bokeh is lovely from the new "AF-S G", I had the AF-D version and its noisy, with bad bokeh! But this one gives quite smooth without any "doubbling / splitting" effects.anybody has both the 50/1.8D and the 50/1.8G and can do some simple side-by-side comparisons of bokeh, etc?
Just SOOC JPGs would be great
Or else I've gotta go get the 50/1.8G for myself and try try... hehehehe![]()
Without a doubt, the Bokeh is lovely from the new "AF-S G", I had the AF-D version and its noisy, with bad bokeh! But this one gives quite smooth without any "doubbling / splitting" effects.
The extra $100 is worth it![]()