There is a saying I recall ...
Rule with an iron fist ... in a velvet glove.
Bear in mind that talk is cheap; even the lowest of lowlifes will spew all sorts of exonerating circumstances and reasons, as well as beg for mercy and promise victim, authorities, parents and the heavens and earth and hell to never to do it again.
Sit in the gallery of the sub courts and this is all you will ever hear from morning till the court closes for the day. It's like a broken record.
What I do see as factual is that the (alleged) prep has:
1) first stolen,
2) used the stolen material to deceive others in the hope of monetary gains,
3) was discovered,
4) attempted to placate by apologising profusely,
5) further added to the deception by providing false information by means of IC number in the hope that it would give the impression of forthrightness and honesty, which clearly wasn't the case.
These are probably the only facts that are clear in the entire episode and the series of occurances seem to hint at a certain pattern.
Whether he is or is not in a position to pay is irrelevant to the crimes, and being (allegedly) 18 years of age, if that is even true, does not relinquish responsibility or accountability.
I do not think a young man's future, IF he is 18 years of age should be burdened by a criminal record, but neither do I think that such a clear pattern of further deliberate deception should go unpunished in equal measure, and it is this further action which may actually be more insidious than the original crime.
A truly remorseful man does not try to right his wrong by lying even more.
for a person to "deserve a 2nd chance" he/she must first be truly sorry for the wrong that was done.
realise his/her mistake
and be truthful about everything
my advice to joe is to come clean and put everything on the slate
so that it can be wipe clean
but this is solely up to the affected photographers
well said . i agreed . joe it best to come clean to the photographers that u have cause damage . dont hide anything u are still young still have far ahead . it best to learn the hard way now. or else really no one can really help u or give u a second chance
for a person to "deserve a 2nd chance" he/she must first be truly sorry for the wrong that was done.
realise his/her mistake
and be truthful about everything
my advice to joe is to come clean and put everything on the slate
so that it can be wipe clean
any more deceit would make it difficult
but this is solely up to the affected photographers
kaypo mode on
all screenshots should be consolidated and made available to the affected photographers
kaypo mode off
Can i ask, how far can the punishment get since there are so many replies saying not to ruin such a young life's future etc?
let's not talk about what the offended photogs will want to do. But in sg law context, what is it actually?
Can i ask, how far can the punishment get since there are so many replies saying not to ruin such a young life's future etc?
let's not talk about what the offended photogs will want to do. But in sg law context, what is it actually?
A school in Singapore was fine $15K for using 3 photos as their school banners on their website without permission. And that is for non-profit purpose. Not sure in this case where is it for profit, and also he used so many......$200-$300K? 80% goes to lawyer fees actually.
I think the majority of the photographers involved in this case uses original photo editing softwares. Looking at their conviction to drive out IP thieves, I have no doubt in my mind this is the case.