Astro said:Don't quite understand why is impact considered as user unfriendly? Can you explain abit more?
eikin said:'impact' may not be that good a font as some alphabets may not be clear enough to be deciphered very quickly (actually i heard from my friend in the graphics line that the most readable font is Times New Roman, that's why the newspaper use it).
ServeChilled said:Too much text and stuff outside and the bottom of the mag looks weird, duno why..
i prefer simple stuff like prolly just the magazine's name and prolly just some words in not so bold fonts...
iD's cover not bad...
ServeChilled said:Too much text and stuff outside and the bottom of the mag looks weird, duno why..
i prefer simple stuff like prolly just the magazine's name and prolly just some words in not so bold fonts...
iD's cover not bad...
Astro said:Oops... didn't know there is really such a website around. hope I dont get sue for copyright or anything... :bsmilie:
http://www.travelation.com/Engine/
Paul_Yeo said:maybe they like your design and then employ you as their cover designer
wahlao1 said:Hi Astro,
I personally like your attempt very much ! :thumbsup:
I don't find it wordy etc. Normally when I am at the magazine section, I just scan through on the magazine cover. See what is covered in the issue ? If there is nothing interesting, I won't even waste time to read/flip it... :bsmilie:
You just have to come out with your own style