Denniswong said:Actually, I think the 4/3 system/setup could actually be more expensive than DSLRs.
This is especially so when you try to get lenses for the 4/3 body.
I noticed that the lenses are all several times more expensive than the DSLR equivalent ones.
Denniswong said:Actually, I think the 4/3 system/setup could actually be more expensive than DSLRs.
This is especially so when you try to get lenses for the 4/3 body.
I noticed that the lenses are all several times more expensive than the DSLR equivalent ones.
zan82 said:Ok I guess you've checked at the wrong places with a sweeping statement.
Just to quote a top of mind, check out the LEICA Summilux 25mm F1.4 and it's equivalent on the M mount. Or the Olympus 45mm. Or the 20mm F1.7.
Oly5050 said:Depends on wat dslrs and wat lenses. I know Nikon has got dirt cheap 50 mm f2 n below lenses. U hv to decide if they give you wat u need. If it does, then dun bother to change.
Ya. Maybe I checked wrong places.
I'm not looking for f3.5-5.6 ones.
Was looking for primes f2 and below, and 35mm or 50mm equivalent on DSLR. But they're really pricey.
Oly5050 said:The amazing 45 f1.8 is abt $400?
m43 fast lenses are not cheap but they are not more expensive than the DSLR lenses. The PL25mm f1.4 is about $800, so is the Nikon 50mm f1.4. Would you like to elaborate further?
Actually, I think the 4/3 system/setup could actually be more expensive than DSLRs.
This is especially so when you try to get lenses for the 4/3 body.
I noticed that the lenses are all several times more expensive than the DSLR equivalent ones.
Oly5050 said:A lens, is a lens, is a lens. Whether it is dslr, or mirrorless type, its a lens.
Metal lens more expensive than plastic. More glass more expensive. Better coatings, more expensive. Special technology, more expensive.
Nikon 50/1.4 is $800? I thought it's 5xx only ...
I kinda agree, good quality m4/3 lenses are not any cheaper than dSLR lenses, now prices for m4/3 bodies are getting to the level of mid range dSLR cameras. The only thing we save is the size/weight I think.
O-MD + 12/2 + 25/1.4 + 45/1.8 will easily cost more than 3500SGD, this amount of money can easily buy a Pentax K5 + DA15/4 + 50/1.4 + 77/1.8.
fengwei said:I kinda agree, good quality m4/3 lenses are not any cheaper than dSLR lenses, now prices for m4/3 bodies are getting to the level of mid range dSLR cameras. The only thing we save is the size/weight I think.
O-MD + 12/2 + 25/1.4 + 45/1.8 will easily cost more than 3500SGD, this amount of money can easily buy a Pentax K5 + DA15/4 + 50/1.4 + 77/1.8.
It may be true but i am not interested in getting a pentax k5. In any case, how to compare? We hv a 12 mm f2. Is tat comparable with a 15 mm f4? Unless this 15 mm is the super pancake.![]()