On the contrary, i can also said that smaller is not necessary better![]()
Yes
That's why I have both DSLR and M4/3.
So I can enjoy both. The Canon DSLR is there for the Background blur for portrait.
Most of the time, I find the M4/3 and LX5 so much fun.
On the contrary, i can also said that smaller is not necessary better![]()
Yes... exactly.
That's why I have both DSLR and M4/3.
So I can enjoy both. The Canon DSLR is there for the Background blur for portrait.
Most of the time, I find the M4/3 and LX5 so much fun.
not THE Canon. your Canon DSLR is not the only camera that can achieve the background blur
Grammar nazi strikes! :sweat:
*runs for cover*
what the!!!
i bet you were gonna say it before you noticed that i already correct him :bsmilie:
Yes... exactly.
That's why I have both DSLR and M4/3.
So I can enjoy both. The Canon DSLR is there for the Background blur for portrait.
Most of the time, I find the M4/3 and LX5 so much fun.
rhino123 said:Huh? My m4/3 can also achieve background blur for portrait. I don't really need DSLR to do that.
Nice thread... especially when I am swapping to mirrorless. I am not a professional, just a causal photographer. Love my D7000 but I find the setup was too heavy for a trip, also no one willing to share my carrying load.Therefore decided to sell my DSLR and since it was now sold, I am ready to get one mirrorless cam. Would be helpful if someone can provide more info.
Nice thread... especially when I am swapping to mirrorless. I am not a professional, just a causal photographer. Love my D7000 but I find the setup was too heavy for a trip, also no one willing to share my carrying load.Therefore decided to sell my DSLR and since it was now sold, I am ready to get one mirrorless cam. Would be helpful if someone can provide more info.
Btw, how does the DOF works on the M3/4 as compare to DSLR since it is having a smaller lens? Correct me if I am wrong...
Hi Shahmatt, thanks for the link. It does help on widen my understanding on the format and sensors.
Hi Rhin0123, thanks for the info. I am hoping to gather more info regarding the model pro and cons, the lens availablity as well as the accessories. I know it hard to ask and helpful people like you cant answer without me naming any model.
Frankly, mirrorless cam is very new to me and I am still thinking which model to go with. I am just a causal photographer, most time taking street , family and sometimes some landscape photo.
Fuji x-Pro1 is closer to DSLR but high price tag and the limitation of the lens. I am thinking to get sometime that is more versatile (in term of cost and len availablity). My budget is not more than 2.5k. M3/4 looks good enough for me. I dont actually mind the 2x crop factor. I am looking at Olympus OM-D EM5 and I am still exploring other. Maybe some recommendation would be good.
Btw, how does the DOF works on the M3/4 as compare to DSLR since it is having a smaller lens? Correct me if I am wrong...
Rc311 said:Nice thread... especially when I am swapping to mirrorless. I am not a professional, just a causal photographer. Love my D7000 but I find the setup was too heavy for a trip, also no one willing to share my carrying load.Therefore decided to sell my DSLR and since it was now sold, I am ready to get one mirrorless cam. Would be helpful if someone can provide more info.
U can consider Sony mirrorless SLR like A35, A57. They will be smaller and lighter and still a DSLR fundamentally.
And dont use so many lens. Just use one zoom and one prime. And u are good to go. For causal photographers like us, we don't even need a prime. Just one travel zoom lens will do
U can consider Sony mirrorless SLR like A35, A57. They will be smaller and lighter and still a DSLR fundamentally.
And dont use so many lens. Just use one zoom and one prime. And u are good to go. For causal photographers like us, we don't even need a prime. Just one travel zoom lens will do
rhino123 said:A35 and A57 are SLT and not mirrorless. They have a mirror.
Yes, they are lighter than most DSLR, but I doubt they are smaller and lighter than entry level DSLR, which was essentially almost or at the same size and weigh.