^Yep.
Just to provide my input on a D700/FUJI X100/OM-D user.
For the OM-D, yes, the battery life isn't as good as the DSLR, cos of the size of the battery and the EVF as such. Take note, what I am saying is for the OM-D only (not any other Olympus/Panasonic cameras).
The OM-D is light (HUGE FACTOR), but not too light to make you feel as if it isn't robust enough (like the X-Pro 1). Which makes it great for an everyday camera, and travelling.
Whoever said that Micro4/3 doesnt have fast AF. BLASPHEMY! The AF is amazing for single shots. Crazy fast, giving DSLRs a run for their money, if you use the right lens.
I think the ergonomics is brilliant for its size. Yes, it is smaller than it looks in the commercials. I found the ergonomics right out of the box great, kudos to Olympus for the thumb-grip. Found no issues holding it right out of the box. Of course, people with huge hands might have a problem, and opt to use the Battery grip.
Image Stabilisation is amazing. I take shots with 1/2 second exposure and it comes out looking like I have taken it at 1/500th of a second (handheld). This cannot be done with my DSLR and my X100 handheld.
Lens. Amazing lens for the platform currently. PanaLeica 25mm f/1.4 (my current fav), Olympus 12mm f/2.0 (EXPENSIVE! But great nonetheless), Panasonice 14mm f/2.5 (Awesome lens for its size), Olympus 45mm f/1.8 are my current top lens for the platform. As you can see, focal length is more or less covered with a great usable lens. Macro lens are on the way it seems as well. And the great thing about Micro 4/3 is the flexibility when it comes to adapting lenses to the system. Currently using a Leica 50mm Summicron-M on my OM-D as well. and mmmm...... delicious. though, it will be a 100mm lens equiv. Making it a Leica Telephoto lens
Image Quality-wise, really no issues here. The sensor for the OM-D seems to be waaaay better than the EP-3, and paired with the lens I mentioned, it absolutely shone!!!
Full review: The Olympus OM-D E-M5 â Ming Thein | Photographer - This review explains IQ much better than me.
DSLR-wise, I suppose it will be the platform with the most flexibility out-of-the-box. My recommendations would be a Canon 550d 2nd hand preferably. And you have a plethora of lenses to choose from. You get great battery life, and you have all the settings in the world to learn from. It is robust and is like a tank. Only problem for me with DSLRs, are
1) The Shutter noise really kills it sometimes when I am trying to take people on the streets, as compared to the OM-D and espiecially, the X100.
2) The fact that people on the streets fear DSLRs over every other camera on the planet. Might be a problem for Street Photographers, this is when flippy screens come in handy to shoots from the hip like a pervert (Canon 600d / OM-D)
3) WEIGHT. My OM-D and the Pana Leica 25mm, the Pana 14mm, the Olympus 45mm weighs about a third as a D700 Body ONLY. The 550d might be quite a bit lighter, but with one lens (average prime lens perhaps) the weight changes quite a bit.
So... If you are like me, a person who wants IQ that matches DSLRs with affordable lenses and want to carry little weight as possible with the flexibility of changing out quality lenses with fast AF, OM-D is the pick for me, albeit an expensive pick. (Go 2nd hand!)
OR
If you are a person like me (LOL! It's true!), who wants IQ that really shines in many situations, with brilliant, professional lenses, and great performance in any light possible, and have tons of lenses to choose from (albeit expensive), AND don't mind reliving the days as a primary school student carrying his crazily-heavy schoolbag, (if you wanna bring along numerous lenses), My pick would be the DSLR. And which DSLR for a beginner? 550d OR D3100, if you are one of those people who want to have the newest things? 600d OR D3200
Just to provide my input on a D700/FUJI X100/OM-D user.
For the OM-D, yes, the battery life isn't as good as the DSLR, cos of the size of the battery and the EVF as such. Take note, what I am saying is for the OM-D only (not any other Olympus/Panasonic cameras).
The OM-D is light (HUGE FACTOR), but not too light to make you feel as if it isn't robust enough (like the X-Pro 1). Which makes it great for an everyday camera, and travelling.
Whoever said that Micro4/3 doesnt have fast AF. BLASPHEMY! The AF is amazing for single shots. Crazy fast, giving DSLRs a run for their money, if you use the right lens.
I think the ergonomics is brilliant for its size. Yes, it is smaller than it looks in the commercials. I found the ergonomics right out of the box great, kudos to Olympus for the thumb-grip. Found no issues holding it right out of the box. Of course, people with huge hands might have a problem, and opt to use the Battery grip.
Image Stabilisation is amazing. I take shots with 1/2 second exposure and it comes out looking like I have taken it at 1/500th of a second (handheld). This cannot be done with my DSLR and my X100 handheld.
Lens. Amazing lens for the platform currently. PanaLeica 25mm f/1.4 (my current fav), Olympus 12mm f/2.0 (EXPENSIVE! But great nonetheless), Panasonice 14mm f/2.5 (Awesome lens for its size), Olympus 45mm f/1.8 are my current top lens for the platform. As you can see, focal length is more or less covered with a great usable lens. Macro lens are on the way it seems as well. And the great thing about Micro 4/3 is the flexibility when it comes to adapting lenses to the system. Currently using a Leica 50mm Summicron-M on my OM-D as well. and mmmm...... delicious. though, it will be a 100mm lens equiv. Making it a Leica Telephoto lens
Image Quality-wise, really no issues here. The sensor for the OM-D seems to be waaaay better than the EP-3, and paired with the lens I mentioned, it absolutely shone!!!
Full review: The Olympus OM-D E-M5 â Ming Thein | Photographer - This review explains IQ much better than me.
DSLR-wise, I suppose it will be the platform with the most flexibility out-of-the-box. My recommendations would be a Canon 550d 2nd hand preferably. And you have a plethora of lenses to choose from. You get great battery life, and you have all the settings in the world to learn from. It is robust and is like a tank. Only problem for me with DSLRs, are
1) The Shutter noise really kills it sometimes when I am trying to take people on the streets, as compared to the OM-D and espiecially, the X100.
2) The fact that people on the streets fear DSLRs over every other camera on the planet. Might be a problem for Street Photographers, this is when flippy screens come in handy to shoots from the hip like a pervert (Canon 600d / OM-D)
3) WEIGHT. My OM-D and the Pana Leica 25mm, the Pana 14mm, the Olympus 45mm weighs about a third as a D700 Body ONLY. The 550d might be quite a bit lighter, but with one lens (average prime lens perhaps) the weight changes quite a bit.
So... If you are like me, a person who wants IQ that matches DSLRs with affordable lenses and want to carry little weight as possible with the flexibility of changing out quality lenses with fast AF, OM-D is the pick for me, albeit an expensive pick. (Go 2nd hand!)
OR
If you are a person like me (LOL! It's true!), who wants IQ that really shines in many situations, with brilliant, professional lenses, and great performance in any light possible, and have tons of lenses to choose from (albeit expensive), AND don't mind reliving the days as a primary school student carrying his crazily-heavy schoolbag, (if you wanna bring along numerous lenses), My pick would be the DSLR. And which DSLR for a beginner? 550d OR D3100, if you are one of those people who want to have the newest things? 600d OR D3200