check this thread
http://forums.clubsnap.com/showthread.php?t=268677
http://forums.clubsnap.com/showthread.php?t=268677
Jean, i dont think you will get good shots from a hotel room.... you want to catch the action, the speed, excitement then you got to go down there to the side of the track... no way around it.... afraid to be squashed... get a few guys to stand around you... i am sure you find enough volUnteersi intend to shoot from hotel room.dun intend to go down join the crowd.will be insane.i already so small size, still mus lug the lens around in a crowd i will be squashed.
Yeah, very sensible suggestion.jeanie, why dont u go Sepang have a look first? Easier to decide after u see...
Well.. 2008 is going to be different! ;pAll F1 races are held in day time, typically 2pm local time. The F1 cars don't have headlight at all.
I agree with that... pan.. pan.. good angle liao.. release shutter... @#$%&^.. window not big enough...Jean, i dont think you will get good shots from a hotel room.... you want to catch the action, the speed, excitement then you got to go down there to the side of the track... no way around it.... afraid to be squashed... get a few guys to stand around you... i am sure you find enough volUnteers![]()
I agree with that... pan.. pan.. good angle liao.. release shutter... @#$%&^.. window not big enough...
Could it be F1, night race, through undersea tunnel from Sentosa to ECP then CTE, best is to include the famous 8pm CTE jam...Well.. 2008 is going to be different! ;p
most propably u need abt 2 lens .. the 70 - 200 and the AFs 500 F4 . if the price attracts your wallet., save on the TC..
Use the 500 on the grand stand and tripod
Could it be F1, night race, through undersea tunnel from Sentosa to ECP then CTE, best is to include the famous 8pm CTE jam...
jeanie, why dont u go Sepang have a look first? Easier to decide after u see...
let's just assume F1 is just over the horizon nearby ya?
which iyho is a better lens?
1)300 2.8 with nano crystal blah blah blah blah and a 2x TC
or
2)600mmf4?
will my pics be as sharp if i use 1) compared to 2)?
and for 2)does it come with a carrying case or i have to buy one just to lug it around?
time to ressurect this thread.
question:
is a super sturdy tripod necessary for lenses like 300 2.8 or 600 4?
will monopod be able to support the weight of these lenses?
There are some "thick" monopods that can do the job. The question would be how stable can you hold a super tele with monopods.
I think if it is a night race, it might quite challenging to shoot the race.
BC
It depends on what you wanna shoot. Main reason for a tripod is stability, and that is of primary concern especially to wildlife shooters who use long glass, and often shoot in less than ideal lighting conditions (i.e lower shutter speeds) so a good sturdy tripod would rank high on their list of must-have items. A long telephoto lens is practically useless in most situations without adequate support, in addition they are very awkward and heavy to handhold. However most sports shooters prefer a good sturdy monopod, reason being its easier to deploy and bring around, and also savings in space (e.g see those European soccer matches where they are packed tightly in a row behind the advertisement hoardings behind the goal mouth) For sports shooters, most of the time they are shooting fast action using f2.8 glass, hence higher shutter speeds, so the stability advantage of tripods over monopods is greatly diminished for their needs. I guess portability and practicality is more of a bigger concern for them.time to ressurect this thread.
question:
is a super sturdy tripod necessary for lenses like 300 2.8 or 600 4?
will monopod be able to support the weight of these lenses?