Liaoning girl shoots her mouth off about Sichuan earthquake


Status
Not open for further replies.
I think she might lost her china citizenship...
 

freedom of expression is only acceptable when it pleases our ears. she is expressing a different culture, value and world view that is morally right, at least to herself. whereas the majority of us are send into a culture shock by her speech because we see things with a different lens. We have to react shock because this is the respond that is acceptable by the majority, and this is where we find acceptance.
 

wow nice !!!! i didnt know you can embed video in CS.
 

china is just too big , u will encounter all kind of people ..
she is just one of the many , but i realise some china kids are spoilt brat nowadays due to one child policy
 

What a brat :thumbsd:
 

Guys, this girl has been arrested in China. She will surely regret the things she said.

p.s. Chinese Police (Gong Ann) is not an organization you want to play with. Maybe this girl will disappear forever.
 

freedom of expression is only acceptable when it pleases our ears. she is expressing a different culture, value and world view that is morally right, at least to herself. whereas the majority of us are send into a culture shock by her speech because we see things with a different lens. We have to react shock because this is the respond that is acceptable by the majority, and this is where we find acceptance.

innocent people are dead, injured & maimed. many also lost there loved 1s & homes.

how can any of what she said be right? can this, be acceptable to any sane person on earth?
 

sharon stone is even worse i guess
 

she will get raped to died i believe..haha.

she looked ugly.. :sticktong

sent her to Africa, i think AFRiKAN will love this free gift!

scully, they reject her... :bsmilie:

no la..think african will going to like her...those black man shall take her to do the C** job.:think:

just look at what you guys have posted?
you should also be ashamed of yourselves

infractions given
 

innocent people are dead, injured & maimed. many also lost there loved 1s & homes.

how can any of what she said be right? can this, be acceptable to any sane person on earth?

in her world wat is right is wrong, wat deemed as wrong to you is right to her.

Her paradigm of value differs from the majority - who chose to be on the safe side.

she dares to voice out does not make her worst than those who kept silent and do nothing for the people in sichuan and myanmar.
 

in her world wat is right is wrong, wat deemed as wrong to you is right to her.

Her paradigm of value differs from the majority - who chose to be on the safe side.

she dares to voice out does not make her worst than those who kept silent and do nothing for the people in sichuan and myanmar.

so in the same breath, a psychopath who tortures animals has done no harm to any human being, and in his world it is deemed as right.

is this psychopath equal then, to the minipsychopaths who imagine torturing animals, but do not actually put it into practice?

when thought becomes action, a very very huge line is crossed. as for degrees of action, then the difference is much lessened. a psychopath who only chases kittens around and breaks their tails is no different from a psychopath who kills kittens.

this isn't about being politically correct or not - morality is morality - two wrongs do not make a right. which is also why i agree that the infractions are deserved. they are behaving just as badly as her and not showing any restraint.
 

in her world wat is right is wrong, wat deemed as wrong to you is right to her.

Her paradigm of value differs from the majority - who chose to be on the safe side.

she dares to voice out does not make her worst than those who kept silent and do nothing for the people in sichuan and myanmar.

i oso did not do anything for people affected in those 2 countries... :rolleyes:

even if a criminal got buried & died as a result doesn't mean justice is served... :sweat:

can right & wrong flip-flop so easily? :bigeyes:
 

so in the same breath, a psychopath who tortures animals has done no harm to any human being, and in his world it is deemed as right.

is this psychopath equal then, to the minipsychopaths who imagine torturing animals, but do not actually put it into practice?

when thought becomes action, a very very huge line is crossed. as for degrees of action, then the difference is much lessened. a psychopath who only chases kittens around and breaks their tails is no different from a psychopath who kills kittens.

this isn't about being politically correct or not - morality is morality - two wrongs do not make a right. which is also why i agree that the infractions are deserved. they are behaving just as badly as her and not showing any restraint.

psychopath needs medication, it might sound harsh, and be kept out of circulation.

I've have come across many IMH friends sometimes I feel that they have total freedom, unlike me who are troubled by so many issues of life.
 

i oso did not do anything for people affected in those 2 countries... :rolleyes:

even if a criminal got buried & died as a result doesn't mean justice is served... :sweat:

can right & wrong flip-flop so easily? :bigeyes:

that ain't no absolute hence right and wrong is up to you to interpret.

wat is right or wat is wrong? is black, black? why is it so? becos the world said so.
 

psychopath needs medication, it might sound harsh, and be kept out of circulation.

I've have come across many IMH friends sometimes I feel that they have total freedom, unlike me who are troubled by so many issues of life.

:dunno::dunno::dunno:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top