MichaelLee
Senior Member
afbug said:I believe ibmn is being rational and is correct. There is no point arguing who deserves to be in the CL. The English FA's stand is only the top 4 will qualify for CL. One of the reason they gave is the number of matches played over the entire season and consistancy. Till now, no one, except UEFA, from the football world suggest to take Everton out because they throughly deserves it, esp they are suppose to be struggling.
It is simple. Look at Brazil, the World Champions, if they fail to qualify, they will not defend their title at WC 2006. Champions do not meant automatic qualification.
Having said that, I do feel that the Champions should be allowed to defend its title. UEFA should do something about it. The G14, which includes the much hated Real Madrid and Man Utd should be pressing the issue to UEFA. Both are president and vice president respectively in the G14.
France the defending champion auto qualify to play in World Cup 2002.
But Brazil the defending champion is no longer auto qualify to play in world Cup 2006.
Could u see that the rule is changing ?
I dun think FA should replace Liverpool for Everton...but UEFA could make a way for the Liverpool to play as defending champion rather than replace Everton as top 4 team from EPL..if they really want to...
MU, Arsenal certaionly do not want 5 english team to play in CL..coz the tv right (allocated to English teams) will then be shared by 5 rather than 4.
I will still hold my believe that UEFA will eventually make Liverpool play CL next year...Just like my believe that Liverpool could beat Juventus and Chelsea in CL. (I did write my view before the game started)
Btw....did anyone of u guys place a bet on Liverpool for the CL final ?
Singapore pool offer 1:1.19 to Liverpool @ +1.5 goals.
Juventus the champion, could not even beat Liverpool....u are crazy to think that MIlan could beat liverpool by 2 goals..
But I must admit that the return of 1:1.19 is a bit low..