Why is it that lenses seem to hold their value better than camera bodies? Is because of digital technology where advances happen faster unlike for film which is more mature? Or does it apply to film bodies as well?
Working is the best ;p . You've got salary :bsmilie: .jsbn said:Annual depreciation rate would be like 2%?
Gold is still the winner.
zcf said:I think lens technology don't improve as fast as camera body technology.:think:
Imaging some new generation ultra bright, better quality lens come out once in a while? All the lens price will drop very fast.
ortega said:lenses with lots of technology inside (e.g. VR/OS/IS) would lose value faster than plain jane lens
as there are no electronics to fail. and technology will always change.
Tell me about it... Noct Nikkor is the best example of this. >US$2k on Ebay :bigeyes: :sweat:jdredd said:plus if its a good optic, and line gets discontinued... price can go up due to rarity some more..