hey guys, just started out photog this year feb.. as an amateur.. didn't really have much
time or resources to go deep into it.. however, as i visit forums and read reviews, i've built up
a thinking that whenever a lens has an constant aperture of f2.8, i will think that lens is of
top grade..
but sometimes i wonder that there are lenses of variable aperture which produces images that
will somehow be better than some of those lenses with constant aperture? or is it really true
that those lenses with constant aperture will always be better than lenses with variable
aperture of similar focal length?
please help me understand the photog world better.. thanks!
EDIT: excluding prime lenses as none of them involves variable apertures! and this category totally slipped my mind..
time or resources to go deep into it.. however, as i visit forums and read reviews, i've built up
a thinking that whenever a lens has an constant aperture of f2.8, i will think that lens is of
top grade..
but sometimes i wonder that there are lenses of variable aperture which produces images that
will somehow be better than some of those lenses with constant aperture? or is it really true
that those lenses with constant aperture will always be better than lenses with variable
aperture of similar focal length?
please help me understand the photog world better.. thanks!
EDIT: excluding prime lenses as none of them involves variable apertures! and this category totally slipped my mind..
Last edited: