Here comes Nikon D200... finally a reality


Status
Not open for further replies.
mpenza said:
hmm... believe D200 would be announced soon.... that's probably why Canon is also releasing the 5D....
Yeah, but the target is very different as well as the price range.
 

went a certain shop today who suggested getting the d200 over the d70s
wah piang....

epsn pls reply to the PM
 

Sept 1st is the D-Day for D200. And hopefully more mouth watering lens......:)
 

Pepper said:
Sept 1st is the D-Day for D200. And hopefully more mouth watering lens......:)
Mouth watering? 17-35 f/2.8 already very mouth watering :D
 

the specs looks kinda good to me... :cool: .. its the price that will eventually justify the value of the body too... hahahahaa.... and i hope the price will appeal more pple to join the dark side... :bsmilie:
 

Pepper said:
Sept 1st is the D-Day for D200. And hopefully more mouth watering lens......:)

are u sure will release on 1st of sept?
 

In this two giant japanese camera company, Canon will have a upper hand over the Nikon, even till now.:embrass:
Although I am a Nikon user, you can see that Nikon couldn't afford to produce FF DSLR like the Canon do at a better & better price-tag. Why? It's because the market out there is making the rules.
Look at how much innovations Canon's have come up with. For Nikon, slow man!
Like the IS (Image Stabilizer) the Canon have, is almost ten years ahead of the Nikon's. Not to mentioned the 45AF system, flash-lighting control from camera body itself, DO (Defractive Optics) & more to come...:think: What about Nikon?:dunno:
Even Minolta have it's own patented AS (Anti-Shake) into it's DSLR body too. That is one of the coolest innovation as I can see so far. So, it can fits whatever range of AF lenses too.:bigeyes:
Anyway, I hope years down the road I'm still shooting with Nikon cameras. Hee...hee...;p
 

Spectrum said:
Look at how much innovations Canon's have come up with. For Nikon, slow man!
Like the IS (Image Stabilizer) the Canon have, is almost ten years ahead of the Nikon's. Not to mentioned the 45AF system, flash-lighting control from camera body itself, DO (Defractive Optics) & more to come...:think: What about Nikon?:dunno:
Even Minolta have it's own patented AS (Anti-Shake) into it's DSLR body too. That is one of the coolest innovation as I can see so far. So, it can fits whatever range of AF lenses too.:bigeyes:
Anyway, I hope years down the road I'm still shooting with Nikon cameras. Hee...hee...;p
Oh please!:rolleyes: Not this crap again... Some things: VR came from Nikon, 45AF system not on their pro bodies show how great it is, CLS/iTTL from Nikon, DO that is only used on 2 lenses tells you how well it goes, etc.

Please... spare us the agony...
 

Watcher said:
Oh please!:rolleyes: Not this crap again... Some things: VR came from Nikon, 45AF system not on their pro bodies show how great it is, CLS/iTTL from Nikon, DO that is only used on 2 lenses tells you how well it goes, etc.

Please... spare us the agony...

Sorry about that dude. But this are just something that I just want to highlight only. Well, everybody got a free speach here, right? :dunno:
 

No point keep talking about how much functionalities the other brand offered. However, with competition going on, it will be always good for the consumer.

No point comparing whether Canon or whatsoever brands have more functions, etc....
The most important thing is whether you are happy with what you have (if not, you may jump ship)? And with the basic functions offered, you still can get great image out.

I'm just wondering how much functions does one use? Did you use all the function offered by the camera to capture your image? The functions offered by my camera is more than enough for me to use. :)

Go out and capture some great image, no point keep arguing/complaining about your camera....;)
 

scanner said:
Go out and capture some great image, no point keep arguing/complaining about your camera....;)

Hee...hee....:bsmilie: :thumbsup:
 

King Tiger said:
Yes, Mac was indeed very friendly and look chio also.
Seem like I have fall in love into it:heart:

OT abit, AJ23, you close door go up Tibet mountain to learn skill is it ?
MIA so long oready.:cool:

Was lurking ard, lazy to post. ;p
 

scanner said:
No point keep talking about how much functionalities the other brand offered. However, with competition going on, it will be always good for the consumer.

No point comparing whether Canon or whatsoever brands have more functions, etc....
The most important thing is whether you are happy with what you have (if not, you may jump ship)? And with the basic functions offered, you still can get great image out.

I'm just wondering how much functions does one use? Did you use all the function offered by the camera to capture your image? The functions offered by my camera is more than enough for me to use. :)

Go out and capture some great image, no point keep arguing/complaining about your camera....;)
Agree ! If dont like what u are getting then switch to other brand and u know what u are missing from nikon :devil:
 

Milos pulling lazy chair out, grabbing pop corn and having a cold beer and enjoying the show

anybody joining me? :cool:
 

espn said:
Mouth watering? 17-35 f/2.8 already very mouth watering :D
18-70 f2.8 would be more mouth watering....
 

who needs fullframe (unless if you are a wide angle NUT) when all you get are images with soft corners and exaggerated dust bunnies? go check out those 5D image samples on dpreview and you guys will know what I mean.
 

Astin said:
18-70 f2.8 would be more mouth watering....

if really come out,alot of people will chiong lor.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top