Yeah, but the target is very different as well as the price range.mpenza said:hmm... believe D200 would be announced soon.... that's probably why Canon is also releasing the 5D....
Yeah, but the target is very different as well as the price range.mpenza said:hmm... believe D200 would be announced soon.... that's probably why Canon is also releasing the 5D....
Yup. Bulls.Cheesecake said:
Mouth watering? 17-35 f/2.8 already very mouth wateringPepper said:Sept 1st is the D-Day for D200. And hopefully more mouth watering lens......![]()
Pepper said:Sept 1st is the D-Day for D200. And hopefully more mouth watering lens......![]()
Oh please!Spectrum said:Look at how much innovations Canon's have come up with. For Nikon, slow man!
Like the IS (Image Stabilizer) the Canon have, is almost ten years ahead of the Nikon's. Not to mentioned the 45AF system, flash-lighting control from camera body itself, DO (Defractive Optics) & more to come...:think: What about Nikon?:dunno:
Even Minolta have it's own patented AS (Anti-Shake) into it's DSLR body too. That is one of the coolest innovation as I can see so far. So, it can fits whatever range of AF lenses too.:bigeyes:
Anyway, I hope years down the road I'm still shooting with Nikon cameras. Hee...hee...;p
Watcher said:Oh please!Not this crap again... Some things: VR came from Nikon, 45AF system not on their pro bodies show how great it is, CLS/iTTL from Nikon, DO that is only used on 2 lenses tells you how well it goes, etc.
Please... spare us the agony...
scanner said:Go out and capture some great image, no point keep arguing/complaining about your camera....![]()
King Tiger said:Yes, Mac was indeed very friendly and look chio also.
Seem like I have fall in love into it:heart:
OT abit, AJ23, you close door go up Tibet mountain to learn skill is it ?
MIA so long oready.![]()
Agree ! If dont like what u are getting then switch to other brand and u know what u are missing from nikon :devil:scanner said:No point keep talking about how much functionalities the other brand offered. However, with competition going on, it will be always good for the consumer.
No point comparing whether Canon or whatsoever brands have more functions, etc....
The most important thing is whether you are happy with what you have (if not, you may jump ship)? And with the basic functions offered, you still can get great image out.
I'm just wondering how much functions does one use? Did you use all the function offered by the camera to capture your image? The functions offered by my camera is more than enough for me to use.![]()
Go out and capture some great image, no point keep arguing/complaining about your camera....![]()
18-70 f2.8 would be more mouth watering....espn said:Mouth watering? 17-35 f/2.8 already very mouth watering![]()
Astin said:18-70 f2.8 would be more mouth watering....