Help on Extension tubes/Raynox


The macro rail will cost abt $20-30 bucks from ebay. But still it's not a must to have but a real nice to have.

Have you experienced with these cheap rails? With the weight on it, are they still smooth to adjust? ;)
 

GRbenji said:
Have you experienced with these cheap rails? With the weight on it, are they still smooth to adjust? ;)
Still waiting for it to be shipped to me.

Fed up with cha cha with raynox and or moving the whole damn tripod while focusing
 

i was like you also..deciding between ext tubes/raynox 250.. but i went ahead with the latter..and the results achieved are good enough for me :)

395435_10150658092106454_531041453_11280469_451944698_n.jpg


Hey guys, I'm on the verge of buying an extension tube(probably the Kenko one) or maybe a Raynox 250 to play with macro photography, before really diving in to buy a macro dedicated lens.
Having said that, is there any drawback on the items stated above?? What are the adv/dis-adv of both and which should I get??

I'm using a 600D, have a 50mm 1.8, kit lens 18-55 and a zoom, 18-200.

Thanks in advance! :)
 

Last edited:
Have you experienced with these cheap rails? With the weight on it, are they still smooth to adjust? ;)

Actually, I have one of them... it was not excellent, but good enough for a noob like me... it is just that when I adjust it to the distance I want, I need to physically stabilize it (literally) because the entire camera is shaking and shivering from the movement... and many a time, it caused me my subject.

In the end, I ended up shooting static objects for the time being, until I am experience enough with the rail.
 

Back
Top