Hey guys, I'm on the verge of buying an extension tube(probably the Kenko one) or maybe a Raynox 250 to play with macro photography, before really diving in to buy a macro dedicated lens.
Having said that, is there any drawback on the items stated above?? What are the adv/dis-adv of both and which should I get??
I'm using a 600D, have a 50mm 1.8, kit lens 18-55 and a zoom, 18-200.
Actually, I have one of them... it was not excellent, but good enough for a noob like me... it is just that when I adjust it to the distance I want, I need to physically stabilize it (literally) because the entire camera is shaking and shivering from the movement... and many a time, it caused me my subject.
In the end, I ended up shooting static objects for the time being, until I am experience enough with the rail.