fotoudavid
Senior Member
i think of an ideal:
i submitt a pic, or more, then put BIG watermark.
haha, i happy liao, sleep.
i submitt a pic, or more, then put BIG watermark.
haha, i happy liao, sleep.
ortega said:wah, like that who dare to respond....
we must stand up and make ourselves be heard, don't let ourselves be taken advantaged of.
smurfman said:i think of an ideal:
i submitt a pic, or more, then put BIG watermark.
haha, i happy liao, sleep.
sORe-EyEz said:guilty people c smoke trail run far far loh.:bsmilie:
but in small ways (effective or not) we can educate those who r close 2 us abt such loopholez. i cant image if its a 7yr old kid gets into such a legal trouble... hopefully in d long run organisers will get less pics lo due 2 their own making. let unfair competitions die a natural death...:hung:
even a highly publicised, well funded awareness campaign may not hav a desired impact & effectiveness. jus look at our local "Kindness Week" campaign or wad-nots...:kok:
smurfman said:They must be thinking some ways or another to sue all of us here who post.:think:
smurfman said:PSS. I LONG TIME GIVE UP LIAO.............:cry:
smurfman said:Still waiting for PSS or HPB to clarify.
Waiting................................................................................................:dunno:
I don't think they will response.............Mr. Steven Yee still haven come in, but beside him, where are the rest??? Must be Steven to take the blame???
PSS, forget it lah.................:sticktong
Well... your action doesn't seems like you respect Steven or PSS though...smurfman said:By the way, i got nothing against Mr. Steven Yee.
I respect him.![]()
In the eye of the law, whether you know little english or dunno english at all hold no water if you accept the terms and conditions by submitting the entry.smurfman said:Read the T&Cs again and again and again, still puzzle, if there is anyone competeing, do let me know, i wanna let him or her know: you good lar, i admit defeat, like that also join, wo su le ( i lose liao)................:thumbsup:
To PSS Mr. Steven Yee:
If some one took a very good pic, the image got big impact on our society, everyones loves it, the photographer got famous, HPB very please, then suddenly, the third party which appear in the photo sue HPB, can you let me know what will the photographer bear?
Alot of ppl out there don't read good english, and i am sure that your answer here will made ppl read the T&Cs more carefully, or consult other ppl who commands better english.
Bear in mind that this is a open forum. Be careful on what you post here.
Regards
Smurfman
yqt said:As I've said before, if PSS is only involved in some aspect and not the T&Cs, than PSS will not voice up even if the T&Cs are against the very people that PSS are trying to help, namely the photographer?
If PSS, as part of the org/process of this competation, when knowing something is wrong, do not speak up for the rights of photographers, tell us who esle is close enough to HPB to voice up..
yqt said:I'm sure they do. They are after all part of a stat. board. That is why I find it so unreasonable to say that you have give them full copyrights and if we get sued when THEY use the images, it is not their problem and you have to shoulder all the cost/blame to settle it. And still, PSS knowing full well all this, does nothing and even endorse the competation.
yqt said:Yes, let's all do that.
PSS should reflect if it should do nothing to protect the very people it claim to promote photography to, especially so when things that are not right are happening right under their nose.
PSS should reflect if it should warn photographers who are enjoying the shooting process for this competation that there is a knife hanging over their head.
yqt said:After so many years and so many good photographers have come and gone through PSS, can PSS claim that they can advise photographers on matters relating not only to the process of photography but also on their rights as a photographer? Can PSS at least try to achieve that? Do PSS dare to challange a gov.org. and educate them that their T&Cs are not right?
yqt said:Mr Yee, I have no doubt that you're a good photographer as well as a very helpful one at that. Past post by other CSers here about course conducted by you were full of prise for you. What I find unacceptable and cannot understand ( to the point that it makes my blood boil ) is that, given that PSS have been around for so long, with so many members and some are even professional, how can PSS stand by and do NOTHING when it sees things like this happening! Just because they're not part of the team that drew up the T&Cs, they do nothing even if something is wrong with it? Is this how the top photography club in Singapore think? How can PSS say " We have worked with HPB before and we trust their integrity as an organisation.We trust that they will not misuse the image." if something do go wrong, can we TRUST that PSS or HPB will help us?
PSS have been promoting photography in Singapore for so long. Are they still doing the same thing they have been doing 10,15 years ago? Just promoting the process of taking pictures and nothing else? Come on, straighten your backbone, tell whoever needs your help " the rights and welfare of the photographer have to be looked into. I cannot endorse anything that will put the photographer at a disadvantage ".
yqt said:Bear in mind that PSS is not just any club in SG, to many it is the top photography club in SG. On par or even higher than PPAS ( Professional Photographer's Association of Singapore ), if PSS does nothing to speak up for the rights of photographers, who will?
For PSS to say "We do not have the legal teams to provide advise for photographers" is one thing, but to endorse something like this is another thing. It is like saying " this is OK, this is acceptable, there's nothing wrong with it ". Is that what PSS is saying? If so, than why change things with the Life Is Great competation?
yqt said:It is all right for PSS not to be able to give legal advise, but it should at least make a stand on what is the rights of a photographer and stand by them and not turn a blind eye to it.
Steven Yee said:Hmmm, I just touched down in Singapore. Do you have anything prejudiced against PSS? I am sure there is based on your posts, not just in this thread. Likewise for YQT.
I may have met you,I do not know. But at the TSWL launch at Singapore Arts Museum, one of the clubsnapper came up to me and proudly told me that he feel "shiok" writing against PSS. He said he felt thrilled. What a bore and waste of time.I think we have better things to do. Confucius said," one rice breeds a hundred types of men".
Let us not make clubsnap ugly place. Feedback from many of our associates is they are less prone to post competition details in clubsnap.
PSS is not reimbursed and do not receive donation for its role in this competition.
Usually i dun like to interfere but i think this time things has gone too far. Why has there no one from PSS defend this?eikin said:i'm so disappointed with PSS, why can't other representatives come in to answer yqt's questions? why must wait for Steven to get connection in India? PSS not only one man show right? :dunno:
nemesis32 said:Well... your action doesn't seems like you respect Steven or PSS though...
nemesis32 said:In the eye of the law, whether you know little english or dunno english at all hold no water if you accept the terms and conditions by submitting the entry.
Neither PSS not HPB did anything underhand to coerce you to join the competition. As a participants, it is your responsibilities to read the T&C, agreed before sending in the entries. Since the T&C are clearly spelt out, i do not see any problems. In any case, if you think it's not spelt out clearly, simple, don't join the competition.