yeah, i am glad i chose oly over the gf1
but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.
I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.
yeah, i am glad i chose oly over the gf1
but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.
I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.
but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.
I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.
According to David Chua in his review of the GF1 and the EPL1, although the GF1 AF feels faster, at the end of the day, the results still the same.
Verdict:
In handling the cameras, immediately you will feel that GF1s auto-focusing is faster and seems more decisive and definite. Initial impression is that the GF1 found focus and snapped the shutter much faster than the E-PL1. BUT upon scrutinizing both cameras files in my computer, I have found that the GF1 may have activated its shutter much faster and easier than the E-PL1 but to my disappointment, the hit rates are just as bad as the E-PL1! The number of useable images shot in iAuto mode for both cameras, chasing after running kids, are just about the same amount! We are talking about nailing the focus.
http://www.davidchuaphotography.com/2010/04/08/olympus-e-pl1-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/
i chose oly for the same reason!Frankly speaking (well...me too and almost bought while testing it out...but something finally holding me back.....:bsmilie, I'd since chosen OLY for its colours and sharpness ( way before any PS done, you see...:bigeyes::thumbsup: )
thanks for the update! i will go check out the updater tonight when home... can't install anything in office... arrrgh...the update is available now...i just updated my ep-1
noticible faster of the auto focus function
will test out the new update to see how it fares...haha...definitely not in my case having use the ep-1 & gf1 side by side....even my neice say why oly so lousy..when we are shooting at her bd party...
The epl-1 is markly better....but still not in the same league as a gf1
According to David Chua in his review of the GF1 and the EPL1, although the GF1 AF feels faster, at the end of the day, the results still the same.
Verdict:
In handling the cameras, immediately you will feel that GF1s auto-focusing is faster and seems more decisive and definite. Initial impression is that the GF1 found focus and snapped the shutter much faster than the E-PL1. BUT upon scrutinizing both cameras files in my computer, I have found that the GF1 may have activated its shutter much faster and easier than the E-PL1 but to my disappointment, the hit rates are just as bad as the E-PL1! The number of useable images shot in iAuto mode for both cameras, chasing after running kids, are just about the same amount! We are talking about nailing the focus.
http://www.davidchuaphotography.com/2010/04/08/olympus-e-pl1-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/
haha...definitely not in my case having use the ep-1 & gf1 side by side....even my neice say why oly so lousy..when we are shooting at her bd party...
The epl-1 is markly better....but still not in the same league as a gf1