Faster AF coming to PEN?


yeah, i am glad i chose oly over the gf1

but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.

I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.
 

but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.

I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.

Well coming from IT background I would say that the engineer probably still want to perfect it but that means delay in producing it. However there is such thing as time to market. So they have to release early and issue a patch later.
It is like that even for software & game.

This software is in microchip. It is good already that it can be patched. So I understand and greatful that it can be done and they are doing something about it.
 

u r right oly pen beat gf1 into the 'compact m4/3 market....!

I m glad oly still update the AF as now i am using epl-1 now....
 

but the gf1 AF is so fast no need to update.

I think Oly paiseh..better come up with update for a lame AF system in the 1st place.

According to David Chua in his review of the GF1 and the EPL1, although the GF1 AF feels faster, at the end of the day, the results still the same.

Verdict:

In handling the cameras, immediately you will feel that GF1’s auto-focusing is faster and seems more decisive and definite. Initial impression is that the GF1 “found” focus and snapped the shutter much faster than the E-PL1. BUT upon scrutinizing both cameras’ files in my computer, I have found that the GF1 may have activated it’s shutter much faster and easier than the E-PL1 but to my disappointment, the hit rates are just as bad as the E-PL1! The number of “useable” images shot in iAuto mode for both cameras, chasing after running kids, are just about the same amount! We are talking about nailing the focus.


http://www.davidchuaphotography.com/2010/04/08/olympus-e-pl1-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/
 

According to David Chua in his review of the GF1 and the EPL1, although the GF1 AF feels faster, at the end of the day, the results still the same.

Verdict:

In handling the cameras, immediately you will feel that GF1’s auto-focusing is faster and seems more decisive and definite. Initial impression is that the GF1 “found” focus and snapped the shutter much faster than the E-PL1. BUT upon scrutinizing both cameras’ files in my computer, I have found that the GF1 may have activated it’s shutter much faster and easier than the E-PL1 but to my disappointment, the hit rates are just as bad as the E-PL1! The number of “useable” images shot in iAuto mode for both cameras, chasing after running kids, are just about the same amount! We are talking about nailing the focus.


http://www.davidchuaphotography.com/2010/04/08/olympus-e-pl1-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/


haha...definitely not in my case having use the ep-1 & gf1 side by side....even my neice say why oly so lousy..when we are shooting at her bd party...

The epl-1 is markly better....but still not in the same league as a gf1
 

Hi all

The new firmware update was stated 22nd Apr 2010 on Olympus website. Due to different time zone, may i know what time & date will it be availabled for downloading in singapore?

Thanks
 

the update is available now...i just updated my ep-1
noticible faster of the auto focus function
 

Frankly speaking (well...me too and almost bought while testing it out...but something finally holding me back.....:bsmilie:), I'd since chosen OLY for its colours and sharpness ( way before any PS done, you see...:bigeyes::thumbsup: )
i chose oly for the same reason! :)
 

the update is available now...i just updated my ep-1
noticible faster of the auto focus function
thanks for the update! i will go check out the updater tonight when home... can't install anything in office... arrrgh...
 

haha...definitely not in my case having use the ep-1 & gf1 side by side....even my neice say why oly so lousy..when we are shooting at her bd party...

The epl-1 is markly better....but still not in the same league as a gf1
will test out the new update to see how it fares... :P
 

I have updated my E-P1 a few hours ago and test it with my 17mm lens.

IMHO...Basically It is faster, a tad bit faster I would say. To describe it it is like firmware 1.2 with improved speed. I said so because firmware 1.3 tend to make the green indicator blink earlier before the autofocus lock (kinda faking the autofocus to make it look 'as if' it was faster), but F1.4, it is for real and Altho E-p1 would be considered as a dinosaur in a world of PEN gadgetry ... It is good to see that olympus keep trying hard to improve where they were lacking behing.

Something is always better than nothing in this case.
 

According to David Chua in his review of the GF1 and the EPL1, although the GF1 AF feels faster, at the end of the day, the results still the same.

Verdict:

In handling the cameras, immediately you will feel that GF1’s auto-focusing is faster and seems more decisive and definite. Initial impression is that the GF1 “found” focus and snapped the shutter much faster than the E-PL1. BUT upon scrutinizing both cameras’ files in my computer, I have found that the GF1 may have activated it’s shutter much faster and easier than the E-PL1 but to my disappointment, the hit rates are just as bad as the E-PL1! The number of “useable” images shot in iAuto mode for both cameras, chasing after running kids, are just about the same amount! We are talking about nailing the focus.


http://www.davidchuaphotography.com/2010/04/08/olympus-e-pl1-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-gf1/

I saw some of the pictures he had on his website (whoever David Chua is... sorry arh, I quite sua ku). Why is his shutter speed so slow when taking pictures of running kid? It looks like he's having shakes and stuffs rather than an autofocus issue. I mean iAuto... yes. But surely, iAuto means changing to setting to suit the photo, right? Sorry, I don't use the Auto modes but there should be some setting in iAuto to say you want to take fast moving kids rather than an inanimate flower, right?
 

haha...definitely not in my case having use the ep-1 & gf1 side by side....even my neice say why oly so lousy..when we are shooting at her bd party...

The epl-1 is markly better....but still not in the same league as a gf1

Or even a G1 :rolleyes: coming to two years already since m43 came into the scene.
 

I got faster AF with my ep-2 using pana 14-45mm kit lens, compared to oly 14-42mm. Was glad to bring it for my trip last week. Performance difference is rather obvious. Hopefully with new firmware it can be even faster, going to test it tonight.
 

I have updated my E-p1 with the latest firmware and the AF is very much faster.
 

the update has been running about 10 minutes now without the Ok sign.

is there anything wrong? if i stop the process now will it cause any problems to my camera?
 

Thank God, am I glad to see the OK sign on the LCD....:sweat:

It was actually running and took longer than expected, probably a lot of people doing the updates the same time.

Off to test the so-called improvements now.
 

"- Improved operation so menus and images can be displayed on the rear LCD monitor when using the electronic viewfinder VF-2."

What the above means is that while using EVF, when one presses Menu button or Image Preview button, it switches to LCD automatically, leaving EVF showing nothing, black.

To switch view back to EVF, one presses the EVF button, and Menu or Image Preview shows on EVF. Half-press of shutter also returns one to EVF, but no more in Menu or Image Preview.

So, this is not ideal when one prefers to preview using the EVF or look at the menus through the EVF. It can still be done, but one has to press the EVF button.

I prefer the old version, control of viewing is under the power of the user. Anyway, c'est la vie, will get used to it.


.
 

Last edited:
Finally me too, firmware upgraded & tested. My opinion is with Oly 14-42mm the AF speed difference is obvious but with Pana 20mm seems no difference.

Anyway, happy with the new firmware :cool:
 

Back
Top