Why is it a disappointment? You've been reading too many comments on-line, have you? Saying it isn't tempting implies that you don't own one. How can you know it is a disappointment if you don't have one?
Since I bought mine I have been thrilled with it. I have been extremely pleased with the EOS M, EF-M lenses and little 90EX flash. I am looking forward to getting the EF-M 11-22 STM and I am hoping that Canon will introduce a decent telephoto in the EF-M mount - 55mm or 70mm to 200mm would be great.
Sorry, but I really can't understand all these 'disappointed' comments. They only ever seem to come from people who don't own the camera.
Canon EOS M
It is a disappointment because I was expecting a better product from Canon. Canon was one of the last major camera manufacturers to launch a interchangeable lens mirrorless system and had the time and opportunity to learn from and innovate on its competitors products. But in the end, the specs were ordinary and even something as fundamental as the spot AF speed in good light was noticeably slower than the competition. Obviously the slow AF is not a concern to you and meets your needs. Presumably most of the stuff you shoot don't really move much or stay still for you. So good for you.
You are correct that I have been reading and viewing reviews online. That's called doing your homework before making a purchase. However, I have also tested the actual camera to see for myself if the criticism of the AF speed was warranted. Sure there were good things about the camera, but the slow AF speed made it a non-starter for me.
Unlike you, I was planning to use the M with EF lenses. This is one major selling point of the M. I think a number of Canon DSLR users would find the M a good back-up body to bring along on travels. However, pairing the M with EF-lenses will mean a front heavy camera with an uneven weight balance. Using the LCD screen to nail focus is not ideal and an EVF makes sense. But wait, Canon decided not to have a hotshoe so there is no option to mount an EVF accessory. So as a Canon DSLR user, the M was not a compelling buy. If I was considering a standalone system, the m4/3 system is far better.
So yes it is possible for people who don't own a product to be disappointed with it. If more people loved the M as much as you do, B&H and Canon would not have had to slash the price.
Already got firmware to improve the AF lah. So what you know is out-dated.
What do you want further? Any compact size that can mount DSLR lenses will make uneven weight balance. Can you tell us which model doesn't suffer from this?
Another thing, it's good that you read reviews. But always take them with pitch of salt. Many of them are like you, can comment alot but don't even own that camera. They are just 'parroting'
Soo... is anyone gonna conduct a mass-buy from B&H to save shipping? Hehe
Confirm that US sets have no warranty in SG?
I am aware of the firmware update. Is there a significant improvement?
The uneven weight balance problem is not a criticism. I agree with you that it's to be expected. That's why I found it odd that there was no possibility of an optional EVF.
Agree also reviews should not be believed 100%. That's why I tested the camera despite the negative comments. I really wanted to buy it.
I NSF doing NDP. How to coordinate, bro?How good is this guy with older manual focus glass? Compatibility wise...
Yes, warranty is not recognised by Canon Singapore. You can still send it for repairs but charges apply.
Oh sian liao. Bo hua like that
Best is to buy local.
Prices on the EOS-M are or will be discounted all over the world. I just stepped into my local dealership today in Toronto and I noticed that the shelf price still had the old one on it. One of the sales people said that pricing is determined by the local Canon distributor and if B&H had discounted their models based on Canon USA discounts then most retail outlets will eventually adopt the new pricing.
He then went into the store's computer and checked for current pricing on the EOS-M. Sure enough, the store's head office had just discounted it to be in line with B&H pricing. The sales person surmised that Canon was either dropping the EOS-M or an upgraded model was in the works... perhaps an EOS-M Mk II
Advantages for buying local:
i) Avoidance of shipping costs, GST and foreign exchange rates.
ii) Local warranty! Products bought outside of the country are not warranted by local Canon distributor. If warranty work is required, shipping costs, long periods without camera and frustrations will occur especially if repair work is substandard and must be returned yet again.
iii) Support good, honest, hardworking local retailers. The stronger they get, the better they can serve you!
Note: I am not affiliated in any way with local retailers in Singapore (but I do support the good one's when I'm there).
Buying local works for Singapore, but US's twisted tax laws is another story. I was in New York last month and I visited B&H's store there. Had this deal been available then, I would have paid US$299 + NY sales tax (about 8-9% I think). But now I am in Seattle, about 5000km away, I only pay US$299 total. No sales tax and free shipping. So it is actually cheaper for me to buy it when I am 5000km away, and they have to mail it to me!
If more people loved the M as much as you do, B&H and Canon would not have had to slash the price.
But wait, Canon decided not to have a hotshoe so there is no option to mount an EVF accessory.
The EOS-M has a hotshoe but no hotshoe EVF.
You in NDP? Which unit? ;p
No need to buy from overseas. Canon Singapore has also dropped the suggested retail price to $769. Actual street price may be $600++.