EF 11-24 F/4L


Crazy price... better to rent.
 

Thanks guys. Put it to real world use and its very impressive. Will be bringing it to kyoto for cherry blossom.

I'm on reservist now, but i'll post a picture of canon's zoom trinity when i'm back.

After so many years, i have the complete range from 11mm-200mm, non overlapping.
 

nice hehe... i presume 11-24, 24-70 and 70-200. add one more 200-400 F4 and you get non overlapping coverage to 400mm, with built in 1.4 TC to 560mm!

Thanks guys. Put it to real world use and its very impressive. Will be bringing it to kyoto for cherry blossom.

I'm on reservist now, but i'll post a picture of canon's zoom trinity when i'm back.

After so many years, i have the complete range from 11mm-200mm, non overlapping.
 

Thats right. I dont have a need for 200-400 other wise it would have been bought...
 

nice hehe... i presume 11-24, 24-70 and 70-200. add one more 200-400 F4 and you get non overlapping coverage to 400mm, with built in 1.4 TC to 560mm!

I have 16-35 f/4, 24-105 f/4 and 70-200 f/4 IS. All lightweight. Still wondering if I should replace my 24-105 with 24-70 f/4.

Anyway, with the release of the optically awesome 11-24, Canon has finally laid to rest all the years of endless derision that they cannot do wide angle lenses. Perhaps, it's time to work on their 35 f/1.4, 50 f1.4 and f/1.8, 85 f/1.2 and f/1.8. Also, more primes needed for their EF-S and EF-M users.
 

I have 16-35 f/4, 24-105 f/4 and 70-200 f/4 IS. All lightweight. Still wondering if I should replace my 24-105 with 24-70 f/4.

Anyway, with the release of the optically awesome 11-24, Canon has finally laid to rest all the years of endless derision that they cannot do wide angle lenses. Perhaps, it's time to work on their 35 f/1.4, 50 f1.4 and f/1.8, 85 f/1.2 and f/1.8. Also, more primes needed for their EF-S and EF-M users.

Right on! :thumbsup:
 

I have 16-35 f/4, 24-105 f/4 and 70-200 f/4 IS. All lightweight. Still wondering if I should replace my 24-105 with 24-70 f/4.

Anyway, with the release of the optically awesome 11-24, Canon has finally laid to rest all the years of endless derision that they cannot do wide angle lenses. Perhaps, it's time to work on their 35 f/1.4, 50 f1.4 and f/1.8, 85 f/1.2 and f/1.8. Also, more primes needed for their EF-S and EF-M users.

Canon refreshed their telephotos. Now seemingly updating their ultra-wides, but the 16-35 f/2.8 could also do with an update. Add in IS, improve the corners, remove coma/CA, better coatings... etc.

Canon's f/4 zoom lens range (8-15, 11-24, 16-35 IS, 24-70 IS, 24-105 IS, 70-200 IS, 200-400 IS) is pretty complete and updated now. Awaiting for them to fill up/update gaps in the f/2.8 zoom offerings.
:)
 

As promised, a picture of my trilogy.

20525_427218374123646_4550760571149028470_n.jpg
 

I paid 3.8+k for a really hard to get lens at this point.

Is it worth it? Absolutely, for the widest rectilinear lens currently on the market and being an early adopter of it.

So no, it's not an overkill. I make the money back through photo work anyway
 

I have checked and it is about $3.7-3.8k from various shops.

Thats not too bad ... Their 14mm prime also near that range ...

But at the moment, my samyang 14mm manual sounds like a really good buy at $400 and its so easy to get the photos super sharp (if you take anything that is >3metres away and @ f8)
 

Last edited:
Some quick shots I did last night with the 1dx + 11-24 combo


10959939_424490467729770_5594890526642036915_o.jpg


10818512_424492427729574_8429833547760888942_o.jpg

they look pretty sharp but I must say the 11mm perspective is a bit weird for me

i have to constantly tell myself it's not barrel distortion it's not barrel distortion it's not barrel distortion it's not barrel distortion

😂

$4.5k at f4 :(
 

Back
Top