If leica lenses are too expensive to buy, should consider contax's range of carl zeiss lenses, cheaper by a lot, and affordable to the Canon or Nikon users too.
Originally posted by xplorer2
Still what basically sets the Leicas apart are their performance wide open. This is where they will excel over their Japanese counterparts. When you stopped the lenses down to f5.6 - f8 they will all perform uniformly well.
That being the case, is it worth to pay that much a premium over Leica glass? To each his own I would say
BTW, Leica resale prices have gone down recently - I recently picked up a MINT M6 + Summicron 50/2 for $2800 from Ebay. I know that it's still expensive but compared to what Leica was a couple of years back. It's still have come down a lot.
Just my 2 cents worth.
zekai said:woah you dig up a one year old thread
MooEy said:haha 1 year old thread, not bad wor.
anyway hor, this is wat i feel lor, leica have been beri well known for consistency lor. u can always buy a leica and know it will be sharp even wide open. jap brands not that great, in the past most of them produce cheapo prime lens which where awful wide open.
but i think over the years manufacturing gets alot better liao, difference in optical performance between leica and higher end jap lens should not have much difference. i dun think much people will be able to tell any difference of spherical aberation lesser than 1/8 wave.
but when it comes to functions, the japs seem to have the upper hand now. today's jap lens all so advance, got usm/af-s and vr/is. dunno if leica ever going to add those technology into it's lens.
~MooEy~
KSeet said:Hmm..interesting thread..
Does anyone recommend the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1?
Do you think Leica lenses outperform the top end lenses from Nikon/Canon?
Or Minolta for that matter.
Or is it just a fad that they are sharper, more contrasty, etc?
Regards
CK
Do you think Leica lenses outperform the top end lenses from Nikon/Canon?
Or Minolta for that matter.
Or is it just a fad that they are sharper, more contrasty, etc?
Regards
CK
OMG, i m thinking of getting LCA+ n Holga, I must b from the wrong planet.
Nowadays the gap between japanese n german makes are small,
there are other factors, like automation, better metering etc.
well if canon is good enuff for george lepp or arthur morris, should b alrite for mi.
wah someone really searched a 2004 thread and dug it out... lolx...
COSINA VOIGTLANDER!!! :gbounce: :gbounce: :gbounce:
Two questions for you:
1. Define "outperform". Hint: It's should not be just lpm or contrast.
2. Does it really matter? That is: Are you going to switch to Leica based on our "comments"?
If you want reliable "scientific" and "objective" evidence, you should go look at the MTF charts and optical design diagrams and really understand them. Asking for "comments" here gets you nothing except lots of pro and anti-Leica camps slugging it out.