that was rather unneccessaryschon said:dear daphne, if you think the fx9 sux, do feel free to go back to your ixus. nobody's forcing the lumix down your throat.
noise is a fact of life for p&s cameras (apart from the f11). if you can't accept it, get a dslr.
peace.
singdude said:I only see Rolex
Looks like reflection to me too.
ekardo said:was comparing Ixus60 and Fx9 for yesterday dinner outing with colleagues..
FX9 wins hand down...Ixus totally no fight..in all aspect...except the brandname.. (some people are still skeptical on brandnames...)
daphz said:Hexlord: removed the hotlink from dpreview.
reflection: how can it be a reflection?? I am not referring to that orange bit around 5-7pm part, I am referring to for example, the outer ring, with the numbers 40, 50. Can't you see that the space between 40 and 50 is not a 'pure' colour? It's a colourful grain. It is also apparent on the watch face where the dots representing 7 & 8 are...
kiwi2 said:Hi Ekardo,
Huh..?? I assume you are referring to Canon? Since when was there an Ixus60? I think so far it's Ixus55.
Do u mind elaborating briefly what sort of comparisons you did between the 2 cams to come to that conclusion?
I've been thinking between the FX7 or FX 9 vs Canon's Ixus 55. I kinda like the styling of the FX7/9.
Pls correct me if I'm wrong but the FX9 does not have any manual mode? But the Ixus 55 has. How do you make manual exposure adjustments then with the FX9? Is there at least an exposure compensation button?
Thanks.
litefoot said:IXUS 55 doesn't have manual mode. Unless, you mean controlling ISO, WB etc is manual mode which I believe the FX9 can also do that.