Hi guys,
I have done some scanning from my 35mm negative from shop, in so-called 16base(3xxx X 5xxx), 5 or 6M in size. However, it seems like the resolution never matched with the raw photo i saw on monitor that taken by a D70!
My friends told me that the largest size of physical print of 35mm is usually 12x8 inch, and DSLR can go more than that.
I wonder issit because i got a funny scanning of film or it is just true that a resolution of D70 can beat a 35mm SLR image?
I have no idea why my 16base scanning is 3xxx X 5xxx, i thought it should be 22xx X 33xx something.. i read about sometimes a higher resolution scanning will only produce a larger file but not more details.
So issit that a 16base scanning resolution won't match with a DSLR resolution? or i just simply didn't get a TRUE scanning resolution?
Thank you.
I have done some scanning from my 35mm negative from shop, in so-called 16base(3xxx X 5xxx), 5 or 6M in size. However, it seems like the resolution never matched with the raw photo i saw on monitor that taken by a D70!
My friends told me that the largest size of physical print of 35mm is usually 12x8 inch, and DSLR can go more than that.
I wonder issit because i got a funny scanning of film or it is just true that a resolution of D70 can beat a 35mm SLR image?
I have no idea why my 16base scanning is 3xxx X 5xxx, i thought it should be 22xx X 33xx something.. i read about sometimes a higher resolution scanning will only produce a larger file but not more details.
So issit that a 16base scanning resolution won't match with a DSLR resolution? or i just simply didn't get a TRUE scanning resolution?
Thank you.